Passive voice suckkkkkkks. Good thread on good faith!
From: @Toastie
https://journa.host/@Toastie/112134665335686706
Passive voice suckkkkkkks. Good thread on good faith!
From: @Toastie
https://journa.host/@Toastie/112134665335686706
@Toastie @kzodasnowman
Agreed, and your original PV construction was better for that reason. The crime is not the grammar; the crime is obscuring the actor. Your revision was and is solid.
@kzodasnowman Active voice would be "Americans took 90% of the Yurok Tribe's territory..." but that makes Americans the subject instead of the Yurok Tribe.
@Toastie also the correction names the actor, which is at least partially out of passive? Now I have to re-educate myself on passive, heh
@Toastie there's a difference in scale of impact between your use and the article's use 😂
@kzodasnowman In fairness (and to my chagrin) my correction was in PV too 😅
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.