Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Mar-2024 19:23:56 JST Sexy Moon
   Wikipedia "editors" will delete the page about your website that was more notable in the year 2000 than Wikipedia was.
   • georgia and Pleroma-tan like this.
   • Embed this notice
     a (a@fedi.layer02.net)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Mar-2024 19:55:49 JST a

     in reply to

     • a
     @Moon twitter fuckin dead to me when they started pushing trends and for you and news, when jack dorsey said they weren't a social network. ain't no way you gonna get me to give a goddamn shit about blue checks
     Sexy Moon likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     a (a@fedi.layer02.net)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Mar-2024 19:55:50 JST a

     in reply to
     @Moon unrelated but i clicked to their other articles and saw one with the summary
     
     "First they came for the Verified Blue Checks. Then they came for the software developers. Then the journalists left. Then they came for everyone else."
     
     and i want to scream at them like wtf are you saying
     Sexy Moon likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Sprocket (stp@noauthority.social)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Mar-2024 19:55:57 JST Sprocket

     in reply to

     @Moon
     The relevance retards are so stupid, it hurts.
     What's the problem with an existing page that doesn't meet their relevance criteria?
     What's the marginal cost of an article?
     Or do they fear that every single human will create his own page?

     Sexy Moon likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Neko McCatface v2023 :verified::makemeneko: (roboneko@bae.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Mar-2024 19:56:27 JST Neko McCatface v2023 :verified::makemeneko:

     in reply to
     @Moon the editors double as partisan vandals at this point
     Sexy Moon likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Mar-2024 23:37:39 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • "; DROP TABLE Users;
     @TURBORETARD9000 there are a lot of bad articles tbh
   • Embed this notice
     "; DROP TABLE Users; (turboretard9000@bae.st)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Mar-2024 23:37:40 JST "; DROP TABLE Users;

     in reply to
     @Moon This article seems quite weird
     It spends maybe a paragraph talking about the title and then just goes on talking about the site itself
     Seems like the author doesn't really care, just wants to give a eulogy
   • Embed this notice
     :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans: (allison@hidamari.apartments)'s status on Tuesday, 19-Mar-2024 23:40:22 JST :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans: :blobancap: :blobcattrans:

     in reply to

     • "; DROP TABLE Users;
     @Moon @TURBORETARD9000 I would say in my experience maybe one out of every three have obvious factual errors or glaring omissions that simply can't be fixed because of wiki politics, most are "eh, it's fine, but it could be a lot better", and then there are a very few where they're both solid and compliant with the demands wiki politics imposes on them
   • Embed this notice
     Pleroma-tan (kirby@lab.nyanide.com)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Mar-2024 00:40:56 JST Pleroma-tan

     in reply to
     @Moon Not Notable