Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Pete Ashton (pete@social.coop)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 09:50:20 JST Pete Ashton

   • Tim Chambers
   • Johannes Ernst
   • Katanova, the Lucent Nomad

   @J12t @katanova @tchambers I see this as analogous to autonomous towns which have their own rules but, critically, engage with the wider world, because to do otherwise would be insane.

   I also think the current Mastodon model is no where near finished and needs a lot of work if it’s going to map onto actual human needs. (It doesn’t have to, but if that’s the goal…)

   • Tim Chambers repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Katanova, the Lucent Nomad (katanova@social.coop)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 09:50:44 JST Katanova, the Lucent Nomad

     in reply to

     • Tim Chambers
     • Johannes Ernst

     I'm with @pete on this one. There is no singular monolithic fediverse and I believe trying to aim towards implementing a solution that makes this hypothetical monolithic fediverse happy is a losing proposition. The fediverse succeeds when it's accepted as a widely varied space that meets different people's needs in different ways, and it fails when different people with different needs try to exert control over the whole space as a monolith to suit their own needs exclusively

     @J12t @tchambers