Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Ed Davies (edavies@functional.cafe)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Mar-2024 06:37:38 JST Ed Davies

   • Earthshine
   • tillian 🦊🦇🇵🇸:antifa: ACAB

   @earthshine And YYYY-DD-MM, as I saw on here recently, is truly an abomination.

   @mynameistillian

   • Embed this notice
     clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Mar-2024 06:37:37 JST clacke

     in reply to

     • Earthshine
     • tillian 🦊🦇🇵🇸:antifa: ACAB
     @edavies @earthshine @mynameistillian There is no system that intentionally uses YYYY-DD-MM, but I have actually seen it recently when it was the case of one of DD-MM-YYYY and MM-DD-YYYY being misinterpreted as the other and then reformatted to ISO order.
   • Embed this notice
     Paolo Redaelli (paoloredaelli@mastodon.uno)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 13:22:37 JST Paolo Redaelli

     in reply to

     • clacke
     • Earthshine
     • tillian 🦊🦇🇵🇸:antifa: ACAB

     @clacke @earthshine @edavies @mynameistillian
     the best aspect of YYYY-MM-DD is that text sorting also correctly sort by date!
     you're welcome :P

     clacke likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Mar-2024 13:24:38 JST clacke

     in reply to

     • Paolo Redaelli
     • Earthshine
     • tillian 🦊🦇🇵🇸:antifa: ACAB

     @paoloredaelli Yup. That's why Swedes have been proudly using YYYY-MM-DD since before it even became an ISO standard.

     @earthshine @edavies @mynameistillian