Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   iced depresso (icedquinn@blob.cat)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Mar-2024 01:49:46 JST iced depresso

   • Ever Beedle
   @dave i didn't read much about that; didn't they try to deballot him for some weird reason and not the usual "muh insurrection"
   • Embed this notice
     iced depresso (icedquinn@blob.cat)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Mar-2024 02:35:50 JST iced depresso

     in reply to

     • Ever Beedle
     @dave technically the southerners the law was made for weren't convicted of anything either
   • Embed this notice
     Ever Beedle (dave@gleasonator.com)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Mar-2024 02:35:51 JST Ever Beedle

     in reply to

     @icedquinn No, it was the "insurrection". The constitution actually has a clause stating insurrectionists can't hold office, which was their rationale, but that logic just had one teeny tiny little problem, which was that Trump has never been convicted of anything, which was why it was an easy ruling from SCOTUS.