It reads like a chatgpt book report...but to be fair the headline is a lie.
Here is what the report says, it's specifically talking about areas like aerospace:
According to experts, both memory safe and memory unsafe programming languages meet these requirements. At this time, the most widely used languages that meet all three properties are C and C++, which are not memory safe programming languages. Rust, one example of a memory safe programming language, has the three requisite properties above, but has not yet been proven in space systems. Further progress on development toolchains, workforce education, and fielded case studies are needed to demonstrate the viability of memory safe languages in these use cases. In the interim, there are other ways to achieve memory safe outcomes at scale by using secure building blocks. Therefore, to reduce memory safety vulnerabilities in space or other embedded systems that face similar constraints, a complementary approach to implement memory safety through hardware can be explored.
back in the day, I had **Fifth** for my TI luggable. just shove the floppy with the 5th interpreter in one slot, and your program in the other and boot up .. .. .. it was almost indistinguishable from assembly language