Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Friday, 23-Feb-2024 05:14:33 JST Marco Rogers

   I still maintain that the at protocol means that bluesky should be included in the definition of "the fediverse". I know it will take people some time to come around on that. And certainly bsky still has some promises to deliver on. But the actual fediverse will be so much messier than what people have in their heads right now. The lines will all be blurry and gray. By design.

   • Embed this notice
     Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 23-Feb-2024 05:14:22 JST Eugen Rochko

     in reply to

     • かき@GNUsocialJP

     @polotek In my view the fediverse is the network of platforms that speak ActivityPub. Anything else dilutes the usefulness of the term, because no matter how federated XMPP or Diaspora are, I can't communicate with them directly from a Pixelfed account like I can with Mastodon or Misskey.

   • Embed this notice
     Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 23-Feb-2024 05:15:39 JST Eugen Rochko

     in reply to

     • かき@GNUsocialJP

     @polotek It's true that the fediverse as a term was already in use back when the protocol was OStatus, and not ActivityPub, but it is a direct continuation of the same network, e.g. mastodon.social started as an OStatus node and then became an ActivityPub node, so in my view it's appropriate.

   • Embed this notice
     Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 23-Feb-2024 05:32:41 JST Eugen Rochko

     in reply to

     • かき@GNUsocialJP

     @polotek What is the purpose of the term fediverse in your opinion? If it's anything that is federated, then is e-mail and the telephone system also part of the fediverse? If not, why should Bluesky be?

     Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Friday, 23-Feb-2024 05:32:45 JST Marco Rogers

     in reply to

     • Eugen Rochko

     @Gargron yes I understand the perspective. I still disagree with it. Explaining it again doesn't change anything.

   • Embed this notice
     Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Friday, 23-Feb-2024 12:32:25 JST Marco Rogers

     in reply to

     What bothers me more is how much of nerd culture is not self-aware about how much their ethos is about policing. Keeping people out or forcing them to conform. Many of these folks fancy themselves as anti-establishment. But the energy is constantly doing cop shit. They just wanna *be* the establishment.

   • Embed this notice
     Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Friday, 23-Feb-2024 12:32:33 JST Marco Rogers

     in reply to

     Let me find a way to critique without being acerbic. I don't like how people popup to tell me they disagree about how to define the fediverse. But that's not important

     What I do think is important is how hard people work to gatekeep and squeeze down the actual promise and potential of the fediverse. It's exactly the kind of pedantic myopia that reminds us that the nerds will not lead us to the future we want. That's not what they do.

     Paul Cantrell repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Marco Rogers (polotek@social.polotek.net)'s status on Friday, 23-Feb-2024 12:32:35 JST Marco Rogers

     in reply to

     Me, clearly and explicitly: "I have this idea. It's unpopular today, so I'm sure it'll take people a while to come around on this idea..."

     Other people, immediately: "No! I absolutely disagree with you at this point in time!"

     Me: "Yes, I know. That's why I... you know what, it's fine. Thanks for stopping by."

   • Embed this notice
     Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Friday, 23-Feb-2024 12:46:29 JST Evan Prodromou

     in reply to

     • Eugen Rochko

     @Gargron @polotek agreed