If we lived in the parallel universe where Zefram Cochrane doesn't shoot the Vulcan, this would all just be hypertext! Just HTML with a tasteful stylesheet. Oh, that reference to another paper looks interesting? Just click on it and have a lookaroo
@oblomov@aeva Why wouldn't the authors give a link to the arxiv repository or personal hosting of the pdf? Do the publishers disallow those links on the principle that they aren't scholarly?
@TheZouave@aeva interestingly, more modern documents are also available in HTML form, and both PDFs and HTML have hyperlinks for citations that you can follow —as long as you have the luck of belonging to an institution that subscribes to that particular journal and/or the authors shelled thousands of dollars to make it open access.
@aeva You know, it's kind of crazy how much everyone has been convinced to give useless citations and/or references. Compare and contrast how many times you've gone through looking up a citation versus clicking a hyperlink.
But it's a crappy bandaid that even researchers have done for decades, because all incentives point toward keeping this crappy system and no incentives point away.
Again, the first thing needed would be a modern replacement for pdf *files*, one that does things so much better it's worth the pain of switching. The main audience for papers is other researchers and web pages don't work.
@aeva@TheZouave Most research is paywalled, often even to other researchers. I have published papers that I myself don't have access to. It's absolutely ridiculous. That's why Sci-hub is thriving for instance.
So it's absolutely normal and expected to ask people for papers. I absolutely understand that it feels awkward if you're not used to it though.
@aeva@TheZouave As a tip: paper authors are usually happy (delighted!) to send you a copy of the paper if you ask. If the citation is somewhat recent you'll at least get a good, crisp pdf, not a third generation photocopy.
But yes, papers are all created for print, not the web. Online repos (biomedcentral, arxiv, journal web sites) often do have a separate list of citations, and sometimes (as for biomedcentral ) links directly to the paper.
@jannem@TheZouave I will give up before I have to cold call email a stranger. "hey sorry I cyber detective stalked you to get your email I swear I'm not a creep I just want your research."
@TheZouave if I'm lucky, what falls out at the end is pdf with OCR text from a scan of a bad photocopy of paper from the late 20th century, and it is inexplicably partially written in greek.
@TheZouave it's a friction thing. With a hyperlink, I click on it and the information is there. For a paper citation, I have to google the name of the author(s), year, and title, wade through a bunch of paywall seo and then find a dead link to a ~ directory on a university website that now redirects to the a generic page full of pictures of smiling twenty somethings doing group work, try archive.org instead, but it's not archived, and then go back to the seo to fish for a doi identifier and
@technomancy I mean it's telling that they identify these by the names of the authors and publications, and not like, the concept they're meant to illustrate
@aeva OTOH HTML still sucks at certain kinds of layout, so in landscape it has a catastrophically suboptimal usage of space. Would be nice if there was a way to have it auto-layout columns in HTML, scrolling horizontally instead of vertically. But such is life.