Never had so many people ask for my take about Wired's piece on getting rid of Section 230 as anything else. So here it is. The piece is terrible and @WIRED should be ashamed. https://www.techdirt.com/2024/02/15/has-wired-given-up-on-fact-checking-publishes-facts-optional-screed-against-section-230-that-gets-almost-everything-wrong/
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Mike Masnick ✅ (mmasnick@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 04:45:21 JST Mike Masnick ✅
-
Embed this notice
josh buermann (buermann@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 08:28:41 JST josh buermann
do you ever get around to actually linking to the offending wired article cuz I can't seem to find my past the opening thesaurus entry for "incorrect"
-
Embed this notice
Mike Masnick ✅ (mmasnick@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 09:37:59 JST Mike Masnick ✅
@buermann @WIRED there's a link to it where I name the title. The whole title is linked.
-
Embed this notice
josh buermann (buermann@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 16:21:42 JST josh buermann
404 words to get to the introduction raised a 404. I beg your pardon.
After RTFA and your response I just have to marvel that anybody can think making publishers more responsible for what they promote could possibly sink the discourse any lower when the Cronkite of our age invites on recurring guests to promote bug-eyed conspiracy theories about how, say, it's the drugs that cause AIDs.
The fundamental disagreement might be that you think everything is fine.
-
Embed this notice
Mike Masnick ✅ (mmasnick@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 16-Feb-2024 17:08:11 JST Mike Masnick ✅
@buermann @WIRED i've read this post twice, and I'm sorry but I don't understand what you're saying.
-
Embed this notice