Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Narada (narada@foxgirl.lol)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Feb-2024 23:56:52 JST Narada

   • Bread up, Bro
   • LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿
   • Otto von shitpost

   I've heard that, but I've never confirmed if it was true

   • Embed this notice
     LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 (lukealmighty@gameliberty.club)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Feb-2024 23:56:51 JST LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿

     in reply to

     • Bread up, Bro
     • Otto von shitpost

     @narada @Ottovonshitpost @sickburnbro
     Also, why would you care?
     A definition of a word is by definition (ironically enough) whateverthefuck you decide it to be.

     So, even if it was gender == sex 50 years ago, it isn't now, and it can be 10 years from now.

   • Embed this notice
     LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 (lukealmighty@gameliberty.club)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2024 00:04:29 JST LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿

     in reply to

     • Bread up, Bro
     • Otto von shitpost

     @narada @Ottovonshitpost @sickburnbro
     I guess.
     I also try to purify my dictionary of many words.
     Good luck with that. :blobinlove:

   • Embed this notice
     Narada (narada@foxgirl.lol)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2024 00:04:30 JST Narada

     in reply to

     • Bread up, Bro
     • LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿
     • Otto von shitpost

     Same reason I don't say gay sex, but sodomy. The Antichrist world system taking over a word 50 years ago isn't different from doing it now. Purity in speech begets purity in thought

   • Embed this notice
     LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 (lukealmighty@gameliberty.club)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2024 17:32:32 JST LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿

     in reply to

     • Bread up, Bro
     • Otto von shitpost

     @narada @Ottovonshitpost @sickburnbro
     Ok, here's my problem.
     I just started to watch Jordan Peterson's "analysis" of a rap song, and what is literally the first thing he says?

     > You shouldn't use the term gender, because the left.....

     You are literally bending to their dishonest rhethoric. And there is literally no reason to do that. Why even acknowledge their insanity as an honest argument? You know they do know the truth, and when you speak, they will be able to translate the words in their heads eventually.

     I fucking hate how the right is willing to bend the knee.

   • Embed this notice
     LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 (lukealmighty@gameliberty.club)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2024 17:41:32 JST LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿

     in reply to

     • Bread up, Bro
     • Otto von shitpost

     @narada @Ottovonshitpost @sickburnbro
     Btw, I am 99 percent sure the switch of terms was not only artificial, but also pre-planned.

     How? Because when the concept of social role based on characteristic was introduced, they called it a "gender ROLE". That phrase is an amalgamation of definitions. If gender = sex, then sex role is exactly, what would fit the lefite definition of "gender". And the lefties used to use the phrase.

     It as if they were using the phrase "knife cutter" while meaning only "knife". It is not a phrase, that had any other reason to exist, then bridge the definition slowly.

   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 08-Feb-2024 21:42:24 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿
     • Otto von shitpost
     @LukeAlmighty @narada @Ottovonshitpost You need to think about this on a larger scale. "No crisis gone to waste" is a simple summation of how progressives work. They desire power, so every opporutinty is used. This also means they constantly wargame ways to break culture to generate power.
     
     As others have mentioned, John Money was possibly the person who first wrote about "gender" as a word which could be seperated from "sex".