Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   FortyTwo™ (fortytwo@noauthority.social)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Feb-2024 12:09:02 JST FortyTwo™

   Let's assume, for a moment, that global warming is real and it is an existential crisis.

   Do you think that novel interventions that could wildly disrupt the atmosphere couldn't possibly have unintended, catastrophic effects?

   That the "cure" could be worse than the "problem"?

   Experts don't have a great track record accounting for "unintended consequences".

   • Embed this notice
     FortyTwo™ (fortytwo@noauthority.social)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Feb-2024 12:09:00 JST FortyTwo™

     in reply to

     • skylar :confederateflag:??? :z:

     @skylar So concerned about CO2, when are we going to address the greatest contributor to global warming -- water vapor!

   • Embed this notice
     skylar :confederateflag:??? :z: (skylar@misskey.yandere.love)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Feb-2024 12:09:02 JST skylar :confederateflag:??? :z:

     in reply to
     @FortyTwo the way global warming shills act spills the beans on the whole thing being a scam
     
     they take the wild leap from what's supported by evidence, burning fossil fuels releases CO2 that causes a slight boost to the greenhouse effect, to their silly fanfiction of "therefore the world will end next tuesday and everyone will die if you don't move to a pod in a 15 minute city and eat bugs and have buttsex with infinity niggers".