Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Monday, 05-Feb-2024 02:08:12 JST Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:

   in reply to

   • Arcanya :arcanya:
   • Adam Greenfield
   @adamgreenfield @Arcana Are you legitimately saying that someone who's possibly escaping others without causing harm should be *forced*, possibly violently, into conflicts?
   Are you for real?
   
   You could petition to have the image capture part be removed or done in safe enough methods (say kept local), not advocate for basically bullying.
   • Embed this notice
     Adam Greenfield (adamgreenfield@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 05-Feb-2024 02:08:13 JST Adam Greenfield

     in reply to

     • Arcanya :arcanya:

     @Arcana For me the bottom line is that it obliterates the possibility of being emotionally present for the others around you, and/therefore the kind of respectful, face-to-face encounter, as rough equals, that my preferred flavor of politics is built on.

   • Embed this notice
     Adam Greenfield (adamgreenfield@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 05-Feb-2024 02:08:15 JST Adam Greenfield

     • Arcanya :arcanya:

     @Arcana Well, let me clarify that for me, “direct action” may mean something like asking a user to leave a restaurant, place of business or other shared space. For some, it might include physical confrontation – and though I’d never advocate that, by the same token I hesitate to say that it wouldn’t ever be justified, in cases of e.g. surreptitious image capture.