Not quite sure what to make of this strand of thinking that probes the #climatechange impact of #war
On the one hand it is an objective, fact driven analysis. It doesn't improve the image of war as a policy option (for sane societies with ever more dangerous technology arsenals).
But it *is* awkward. Does it mean that if I plant X number of trees I can throw Y number of bombs? Is war more ok if my tanks are EV? And what of the reduced emissions from all those killed?