GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:33:09 JST feld feld
    AT&T is increasing the cost of my static IPs. Now my /27 is $45/mo
    In conversation Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:33:09 JST from bikeshed.party permalink

    Attachments


    1. https://media.bikeshed.party/pleroma/59af40b91a9722a769d2aa8661c1721221f3079e1fbf8ea4baa93b4fae4171bc.png
    • Embed this notice
      feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:34:12 JST feld feld
      in reply to
      • thegpfury
      @thegpfury Maybe AT&T is reselling IPs delegated to them from Amazon hahahaha
      In conversation Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:34:12 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      thegpfury@excelsior.furytech.net's status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:34:13 JST thegpfury thegpfury
      in reply to

      @feld@bikeshed.party oh nooooo. I just got that too.

      Mine are only going to be $30. but still!!

      In conversation Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:34:13 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:35:00 JST feld feld
      in reply to
      • Alice 🔥 Winter Wonder-Wyrm
      @alicew idk man I have 30 usable static IPs, it's pretty cheap compared to having to colocate. Plus I have 5gbit bandwidth.
      In conversation Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:35:00 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Alice 🔥 Winter Wonder-Wyrm (alicew@bark.lgbt)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:35:01 JST Alice 🔥 Winter Wonder-Wyrm Alice 🔥 Winter Wonder-Wyrm
      in reply to

      @feld jeez, this is why I just use dyndns

      In conversation Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:35:01 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Alice 🔥 Winter Wonder-Wyrm (alicew@bark.lgbt)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:35:58 JST Alice 🔥 Winter Wonder-Wyrm Alice 🔥 Winter Wonder-Wyrm
      in reply to

      @feld oh I didn't know you got that many of them haha

      right. /27

      In conversation Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:35:58 JST permalink
      feld likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:41:53 JST feld feld
      in reply to
      • 7666
      @7666 yeah, I could do that too but then you're just increasing latency and (usually) dealing with a throttled pipe to whichever cloud provider you picked to be your edge.

      The one benefit it would have is moving as it makes your backend infra essentially nomadic. Right now if I move to another apartment AT&T gives me "new service" and they give me a fresh static IP allocation instead of letting me keep my old one. So if I move to a different apartment this year I have to automate updating my DNS and server configs to the new address space which is annoying but not insurmountable
      In conversation Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:41:53 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      7666 (7666@comp.lain.la)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:41:54 JST 7666 7666
      in reply to
      @feld these are the moments in which i'm glad i don't require a single static IP on my home net at all (VPN tunnels negotiate outbound to the edge, not inbound)
      In conversation Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:41:54 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:44:37 JST feld feld
      in reply to
      • 7666
      @7666 a friend of mine just has their own AS and direct allocation so they just do BGP tunneling but damn that's so expensive although I love the idea. I was an engineer at an ISP early in my career and I yearn for that control but the overhead is just... too much.
      In conversation Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:44:37 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      7666 (7666@comp.lain.la)'s status on Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:52:15 JST 7666 7666
      in reply to
      @feld

      >increasing latency
      For bulk traffic, 30-40ms of increased latency is not an issue. For latency sensitive traffic, I use geographically closer datacenters so the latency overhead is at max 8ms for those. I can use policy based routing to pick which VMs (internal IPs) go where.

      >throttled pipe
      see image. I got four of these bad boys

      >nomadic backend
      yep that was the idea. I don't have to pay for IPs, if there's a DHCP problem I don't care about DNS, and all my traffic is proxied and cached where needed to cut down on ISP traffic, while I maintain data sovereignty and the cheaper overall resource cost of rolling your own big fat servers.
      In conversation Friday, 26-Jan-2024 02:52:15 JST permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://comp.lain.la/media/21952318f73b260a8e8e523004feb4b7075449e3d479c83dc0478e55fd000871.png
      feld likes this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.