Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Bø!rge (forteller@tutoteket.no)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jan-2024 02:43:48 JST Bø!rge

   I don't understand Wikipedia's article Comparison of machine translation applications. Under "license" a lot of them just says SaaS. But Software as a service is not a license, it's a business modell or mode of distribution, right? It could be free with the AGPL license, for example, or proprietary. Both can be SaaS, that doesn't tell you anything about their license?

   What am I missing here?

   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_machine_translation_applications

   #wikipedia #licenses #license

   • Embed this notice
     Bø!rge (forteller@tutoteket.no)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jan-2024 02:48:35 JST Bø!rge

     in reply to

     • Lyyn ☮️

     @lyyn Maybe, but shouldn't it then just say "proprietary"?

   • Embed this notice
     Lyyn ☮️ (lyyn@mastodon.ml)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jan-2024 02:48:37 JST Lyyn ☮️

     in reply to

     @forteller Maybe SaaS means that the code is not published at all?

   • Embed this notice
     Bø!rge (forteller@tutoteket.no)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jan-2024 03:17:24 JST Bø!rge

     in reply to

     • Kjetil Kilhavn
     • Lyyn ☮️

     @kjetil_kilhavn Sure, but isn't that irrelevant to the license? Shouldn't there rather be a separate column for SaaS/self hosted/offline/whatever? @lyyn

   • Embed this notice
     Kjetil Kilhavn (kjetil_kilhavn@snabelen.no)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jan-2024 03:17:25 JST Kjetil Kilhavn

     in reply to

     • Lyyn ☮️

     @forteller @lyyn Proprietary could also be self-hosted, so I think it's good that they distinguish them. In reality we can't really know what's 'behind' a SaaS, it could be MIT-licensed software for instance.