Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   :blobcathug: (jain@blob.cat)'s status on Friday, 05-Jan-2024 08:08:44 JST :blobcathug:

   • Kevin Karhan :verified:
   @kkarhan RIP
   Got canceled by Ro
   • Embed this notice
     Olivia ?️‍⚧️ :blobcathearttrans: :blobcatheartbisexual: (voltrina@blob.cat)'s status on Friday, 05-Jan-2024 08:15:21 JST Olivia ?️‍⚧️ :blobcathearttrans: :blobcatheartbisexual:

     in reply to

     • Kevin Karhan :verified:
     @Jain @kkarhan you wouldn't cancel a :blobcat:
     :blobcathug: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     :blobcathug: (jain@blob.cat)'s status on Friday, 05-Jan-2024 09:03:00 JST :blobcathug:

     in reply to

     • Kevin Karhan :verified:
     • Poppy Farbird (Pen Name)
     @limepeep @kkarhan tbh, kkarhan tend to be aggressive on certain topics, but i think his opinion is reasonable... Idk what happened, i just noticed it, i guess i have to read it but im sleepy
   • Embed this notice
     Poppy Farbird (Pen Name) (limepeep@kitty.social)'s status on Friday, 05-Jan-2024 09:03:01 JST Poppy Farbird (Pen Name)

     in reply to

     • Kevin Karhan :verified:

     @Jain@blob.cat @kkarhan@mstdn.social Huh, when I checked their profile, it seemed that one of their recent convos was about how they condemned Ro for his lack of transparency and willingness to appeal blocks, specifically with his overzealous action against innocent instances. Someone then chimed in, calling for Stux to take action against Karhan, since they felt that Ro was innocent and did not deserve the criticism he received. From here, Karhan told the person to fuck off and stated that Stux wouldn't have a reason to listen to Ro (and thus ban them) (they were banned).
     
     Is that true? Imo, unless there was an earlier controversy that happened with them, I feel that Karhan didn't need to get banned.