@becauselangpod @pluralistic The New York Times bowdlerized it into "enjunkification," which is both sad and amusing and has other potential meanings they might not have thought of. But perhaps they rejected "endickification" as too obvious.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Guitarsophist (jredlund@social.linux.pizza)'s status on Saturday, 30-Dec-2023 13:58:23 JST Guitarsophist - clacke likes this.
-
Embed this notice
Guitarsophist (jredlund@social.linux.pizza)'s status on Saturday, 30-Dec-2023 13:58:30 JST Guitarsophist @Zotmeister @becauselangpod @pluralistic Those are good, but "enshitification" is nearly perfect because it sounds academic, implies a slow process, and clearly has shit in it. It is high register academese wrapped around low register street speak, a literal shit sandwich.
clacke likes this. -
Embed this notice
Adam R. Wood (zotmeister@mastodon.online)'s status on Saturday, 30-Dec-2023 13:58:32 JST Adam R. Wood @jredlund @becauselangpod @pluralistic I'd go with "crappify" if I thought it needed amelioration (it doesn't), or "turdicken" if I thought it needed an extra ow-that-pun-has-layers-it-physically-hurts extra punch.
-
Embed this notice
le Pétomane Ancien (lepetomaneancien@fosstodon.org)'s status on Saturday, 30-Dec-2023 13:58:40 JST le Pétomane Ancien @jredlund @becauselangpod @pluralistic An editor at the NY Times bowdlerizing a @pluralistic coinage is the epitome of bringing a knife to a gunfight.
clacke likes this.