philosophy
I see arguments of this form from Christian Nationalists a lot:
1. If we were Christian, we would ban {a bunch of things like feminism}.
2. We really want to ban those things since they're bad.
3. Therefore, we should force Christianity on folks.
This is an affirming the consequent fallacy.
Further, we don't need to force this religion to ban bad things. Christianity, as history has shown, also brings its own bad things.
Uncle Iroh ☑️
You're arguing against straw men claims that CN's never make.
Christian nationalism is not a theocracy, nor does it advocate for one. It advocates for basing law on a Christian moral framework because laws are simply moral "ought" claims, not just "I want because .. feels".
We supposedly already have that, since the legal system is based on the Byzantine Justinian Code, but that's being dismantled at record pace as you're seeing in real time.
Based Bagel
I agree they will lose. The question is how much damage will they do before then?
And that is up to us.
Another thing is we need to get all the jews or whoever the fuck is making all this satanic commie propaganda and put them in gitmo.
I remember watching a great show untill I saw a gay sex scene in ep.3 out of nowhere.
It had nothing to do with the story nad even my normie friend was thrown off by how random it was.
Uncle Iroh ☑️
No content warnings bitch, we're in this room now and we all have to eat the whole ass until it's fixed.
I agree btw. However, people need to understand that taking back power is a multi-generational project. It took commies 60 years minimum to thoroughly capture every aspect of education. They were ambitious, patient and persistent.
This won't happen in my lifetime, but demographics is destiny and since they routinely kill & sterilize their kids, they WILL lose.
Based Bagel
My best guess is that secular people just want to act as if religion is completely useless even if it means disregarding it's clear objective utility throughout history.
We really do need to take power back and do it right this time. 😉
And PLEASE put a content warning on the picture on the right.
I don't think I've ever gotten and lost a boner so fast...
They're destroying our basic bitehes.... Unforgivable!
Uncle Iroh ☑️
Why people don't understand this is beyond me.
Even when the 6ft5in bearded tranny is slapping their face with his girldick, secularists will still insist with no trace or irony that secular morality actually exists.
This kind of derangement cannot be fixed. It is precisely why people with a grounded moral framework need to retake power and shut these degenerate assholes down.
Uncle Iroh ☑️
The other part that is often missed is that this is largely Orthodox Christian in origin.
Protestanism has failed. Catholicism is failing before our very eyes. Both are considered heresies from the Ortho perspective, and this 1000-year argument is now at the "I told you so" stage.
Orthodoxy is based in Byzantium Empire, & since it's fall, has thrived on a decentralized model of church nationalism - Greek, Russian, Syriac etc.. that shares power with the state.
Not a theocracy.
Based Bagel
"moral frameworks cannot be derived from secularism."
Say it again!
You 'can't run a society off of subjective morality. There must be some objective standard or we're wasting our time.
Uncle Iroh ☑️
As the 20th century experiments in communism and the current day West clearly demonstrates, moral frameworks cannot be derived from secularism.
That’s different than forcing belief or church attendance which is absurd.
The biggest single indictment of this is the fact that under secular morality, literally no Western society is able to reproduce itself.
Uncle Iroh ☑️
Now you're getting it. Yes, of course I believe in the metaphysics. And the epistemology, ontology and of course the ethics.
So do secularists but they're usually either too dumb or dishonest to admit/see it.
They use words like best, good, progress, sufering without realizing that these are massive metaphysical claims. They want these words to do the load-bearing of their worldview without any metaphysical justification.
philosophy
@basedbagel @UncleIroh How is Christian ethics not subjective? Unless you already believe the metaphysics, it's just as made up and subjective as any secular ethics.
Uncle Iroh ☑️
It's abundantly clear that you really don't understand Christianity at all.
Not even a bit.
Christ is the living God and we are His children. We are given life's blessing and commanded to bring forth more life in His name.
Christianity is the MOST life-affirming religion as can be seen by historical birth-rates. The religious give birth to far more children than secularists, who murder and sterlize theirs, as is their Satanic wont.
philosophy
@UncleIroh @basedbagel By this argument, Christianity is self-negation and nihilism just as much. Its goal is to get to heaven, and its logical conclusion is that after the rapture, humans will no longer physically exist on Earth.
Uncle Iroh ☑️
Buddhism's purpose to "lived life" is work towards enlightenment such that rebirth no longer happens.
Life itself according to them is proof of our defilement by attachment.
The logical conclusion of their worldview is a world where humans no longer physically exist because they have transcended to a unification with an enlightened universal Oneness.
Buddhism is self-negation and nihilism. GTFO with that nonsense.
Uncle Iroh ☑️
Buddhism is nihilistic. It has contributed a lot to the mechanics of introspection and has a good set of virtue ethics. However, it all comes to naught since it is ultimately grounded in material cause and effect consequentialism via the bullshit concept of karma.
No great empire was or could ever be built on the literal self-negation of Buddhism.
philosophy
@UncleIroh @basedbagel Buddhism is not nihilistic. Nihilism is the idea there is no purpose to life. Buddhism establishes a clear purpose, which is enlightenment. It's literally the opposite of nihilistic. Further, karma is not the end "thing" of Buddhism. Enlightenment is.
This shit is old. You're arguing for a specific conclusion you want and trying to form facts surrounding it. This is such a common theme with conversations with Christians: they warp every other worldview, deliberately.
philosophy
@UncleIroh @basedbagel Well, and here's why Buddhism is outright superior. It has a metaphysics but its central claims have nothing to do with shit humans made up and then want to claim are objective (metaphysics, epistemology and ethics all fall under that). There's nothing false required in Buddhism. Christianity rests on nonsense that a 10 year old that figures out there is no Santa Clause can see through, because it's the same thing if it doesn't have social force behind it.
Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺
@philosophy @UncleIroh @basedbagel what you are referring to is called dispensational premillenialism. It is a surprisingly modern interpretation adopted by American baptists due to the idea being promoted in the Schofield reference bible. >99% of Christians do not, and have never believed in this.
BowserNoodle ☦️
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.