Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Kev Quirk (kev@fosstodon.org)'s status on Sunday, 17-Dec-2023 02:47:59 JST Kev Quirk

   I wrote a thing about #Threads joining the #Fediverse and all the blocking that's ensued as a result.

   https://kevquirk.com/threads-and-the-fediverse

   Drama in 3...2...1... 😂

   • Embed this notice
     Tim Chambers (tchambers@indieweb.social)'s status on Sunday, 17-Dec-2023 02:47:59 JST Tim Chambers

     in reply to

     @kev Kev: well written and good thoughts here. My server came to the same conclusion a while back and are holding the same position now. Kudos for being a good admin and making your position clear for your followers. Here was my version of this that came to the same conclusion:

     https://www.timothychambers.net/2023/06/23/project-and-the.html

   • Embed this notice
     Brendan Jones (brendanjones@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 22-Dec-2023 21:28:49 JST Brendan Jones

     in reply to

     • Fabian (Bocchi) 🏳️‍🌈

     @fabiscafe @kev Might be good to move to a cooperative/democratic server if you want more of a say in server decisions. social.coop, for example.

   • Embed this notice
     Fabian (Bocchi) 🏳️‍🌈 (fabiscafe@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 22-Dec-2023 21:28:51 JST Fabian (Bocchi) 🏳️‍🌈

     in reply to

     @kev thanks. That's my point. I hate that this was decided over my head for me so i probably have to move to another instance. #blockiverse

   • Embed this notice
     Brendan Jones (brendanjones@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 22-Dec-2023 21:31:58 JST Brendan Jones

     in reply to

     • Erik Moeller

     @eloquence @kev That’s definitely my main concern, though I completely agree with Kev’s approach for now. What does the limit do?

   • Embed this notice
     Erik Moeller (eloquence@social.coop)'s status on Friday, 22-Dec-2023 21:31:59 JST Erik Moeller

     in reply to

     @kev

     I think one big argument is that Threads already allows accounts other instances would get limited or suspended over. So size basically gives them cover for bad moderation.

     That's why I voted in favor of "limit" on our server, which is I think generally a good remedy against poorly moderated large servers.

   • Embed this notice
     Brendan Jones (brendanjones@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 22-Dec-2023 21:36:52 JST Brendan Jones

     in reply to

     • Fabian (Bocchi) 🏳️‍🌈

     @fabiscafe @kev ah, also a good option! Nice to have the know-how to have that option yourself, too.

   • Embed this notice
     Fabian (Bocchi) 🏳️‍🌈 (fabiscafe@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 22-Dec-2023 21:36:53 JST Fabian (Bocchi) 🏳️‍🌈

     in reply to

     • Brendan Jones

     @Brendanjones @kev Currently thinking about just doing my own again because I just cant find what I want to have :)

   • Embed this notice
     Kev Quirk (kev@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 22-Dec-2023 23:46:18 JST Kev Quirk

     in reply to

     • Brendan Jones
     • Erik Moeller

     @Brendanjones limit basically means an account can only interact those that already follow it.

     So if I limit userA, and userB already follows A, then B will still see A's posts. But userC won't know A exists as they didn't follow them when they were limited.

     @eloquence