Hey #linguistics folks — is there a word for, and if not can someone coin a word for, things whose functionality is dependent on their existence in the plural?
Some examples:
* Telephones — Alexander Graham Bell was initially disappointed with the apparent uselessness of his first telephone, until the Ghostbusters quote “Who you gonna call?” fell through a rift in time and he realized he needed to invent the second telephone too.
* Train stations — Congratulations! You’ve built the world’s first train station. Where do the trains go?
* LEGO(-alike) building blocks
* Gears
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Luna, but on a new instance (luna@pony.social)'s status on Saturday, 09-Dec-2023 02:49:59 JST Luna, but on a new instance - GreenSkyOverMe (Monika) repeated this.
-
Embed this notice
Luna, but on a new instance (luna@pony.social)'s status on Saturday, 09-Dec-2023 02:50:14 JST Luna, but on a new instance multiple folks (@martin, @Cameleopard) have independently pitched "homodependent" and I think we're onto a winner there
-
Embed this notice
Elio Campitelli (eliocamp@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 09-Dec-2023 02:50:24 JST Elio Campitelli @luna Some ideas: "Segmentary", "Interlocking", "self-insufficient"
-
Embed this notice
GreenSkyOverMe (Monika) (greenskyoverme@ohai.social)'s status on Saturday, 09-Dec-2023 02:50:46 JST GreenSkyOverMe (Monika) @luna @martin @Cameleopard
I am pleased with this solution