GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Mathieu Triclot (mtriclot@aleph.land)'s status on Monday, 04-Dec-2023 23:10:17 JST Mathieu Triclot Mathieu Triclot

    Eliza bat GPT3.5 au test de Turing : https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/12/real-humans-appeared-human-63-of-the-time-in-recent-turing-test-ai-study/ | le style formel des réponses pose problème, même en adaptant les prompts.

    In conversation Monday, 04-Dec-2023 23:10:17 JST from aleph.land permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.arstechnica.net
      1960s chatbot ELIZA beat OpenAI’s GPT-3.5 in a recent Turing test study
      from @benjedwards
      AI chatbot deception paper suggests that some bots (and people) aren't very persuasive.
    • Embed this notice
      Mathieu Triclot (mtriclot@aleph.land)'s status on Monday, 04-Dec-2023 23:10:14 JST Mathieu Triclot Mathieu Triclot
      in reply to

      Variante : chatGPT vs stack overflow. Les utilisateurs préfèrent les réponses de chatGPT, car assertatives, alors que 52% d'erreurs.
      https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02312

      In conversation Monday, 04-Dec-2023 23:10:14 JST permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: static.arxiv.org
        Who Answers It Better? An In-Depth Analysis of ChatGPT and Stack Overflow Answers to Software Engineering Questions
        Over the last decade, Q&A platforms have played a crucial role in how programmers seek help online. The emergence of ChatGPT, however, is causing a shift in this pattern. Despite ChatGPT's popularity, there hasn't been a thorough investigation into the quality and usability of its responses to software engineering queries. To address this gap, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's replies to 517 questions from Stack Overflow (SO). We assessed the correctness, consistency, comprehensiveness, and conciseness of these responses. Additionally, we conducted an extensive linguistic analysis and a user study to gain insights into the linguistic and human aspects of ChatGPT's answers. Our examination revealed that 52% of ChatGPT's answers contain inaccuracies and 77% are verbose. Nevertheless, users still prefer ChatGPT's responses 39.34% of the time due to their comprehensiveness and articulate language style. These findings underscore the need for meticulous error correction in ChatGPT while also raising awareness among users about the potential risks associated with seemingly accurate answers.
    • Embed this notice
      Mathieu Triclot (mtriclot@aleph.land)'s status on Monday, 04-Dec-2023 23:10:16 JST Mathieu Triclot Mathieu Triclot
      in reply to

      En revanche sur les visages, ça passe : les visages engendrés par IA sont jugés plus humains que les originaux
      https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/11/people-think-white-ai-generated-faces-are-more-real-than-actual-photos-study-says/

      In conversation Monday, 04-Dec-2023 23:10:16 JST permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.arstechnica.net
        People think white AI-generated faces are more real than actual photos, study says
        from @benjedwards
        'Hyperrealism' bias may impact medicine and law enforcement. Can you spot the fakes?
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
      Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: repeated this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.