How do you comply with insanely inconsistent, incoherent moral demands?
You just do whatever the demander says, as he says it.
That's the only way to do it. You can't internalize any rules to follow. You can't think through prior demands and make logical inferences. You have to receive instructions and make sure you don't fall offline for too long lest you drift into heresy.

When a leftist makes a moral argument, this is all I see now.
>saying "uoh crying-emoji" is literal pedophilia
>these drawings of imaginary acts is literal child abuse
>but six-year-olds can be sex workers and you're crazy for being concerned about elite pedo parties and Epstein's clients don't need to be prosecuted

>evacuating children from a warzone is a warcrime
>no warcrimes going on right now in the Middle East though. Nor in the past!

>healthy children who are not threatened by covid are LITERALLY KILLING GRANDMA by trying to skate in a skatepark
>riots are fine though