GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 18-Nov-2023 11:20:53 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

    Interesting results.... not what I expected.
    QT: https://qoto.org/@freemo/111423263359537402

    In conversation Saturday, 18-Nov-2023 11:20:53 JST from qoto.org permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net
      🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (@freemo@qoto.org)
      from 🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      Should we let someone die who is unwilling (but otherwise capable) of doing what is needed to stay alive? [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] No vote
    • Embed this notice
      K‮ly‬e (khird@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 18-Nov-2023 11:47:19 JST K‮ly‬e K‮ly‬e
      in reply to

      @freemo I wasn't sure of the scope of your question, so I didn't answer. Suppose a paramedic refuses to provide lifesaving care to a person injured in a car crash, because the injured person was clearly at fault. In a sense, the paramedic "let someone die" who was "unwilling but otherwise capable" of following the rules of the road, which in this case is "what was needed to stay alive". That's quite a different situation from the decision to, say, force-feed a hunger striker.

      In conversation Saturday, 18-Nov-2023 11:47:19 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 18-Nov-2023 12:04:02 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • K‮ly‬e

      @khird It was intentionally without scope, as I want to know what peoples general principles are in evaluating this in **any** scope.

      That said I should have been clear that I am not considering if we should punish someone for **past** decision that they recognize is hurting them in the present.

      I am talking about someone who makes a clear choice for their future on the assumption it is in their best interest but everyone else knows it will result in their death.

      I was thinking in regard of homelessness as an example. If someone refuses to obtain skills and therefore cant afford to feed themselves should we feed them but force them to aquire skills. But then I wanted to apply this more generally... should we stop an alcoholic from drinking even if in the moment they think its what best for them.... etc.

      In conversation Saturday, 18-Nov-2023 12:04:02 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      robryk@qoto.org's status on Saturday, 18-Nov-2023 19:10:30 JST robryk robryk
      in reply to
      • K‮ly‬e

      @freemo @khird example of not past decisions that you probably also didn't want to include: let's say that in a society with no social safety nets there is a person who can not support themselves other than by theft, but refuses to steal.

      In conversation Saturday, 18-Nov-2023 19:10:30 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.