Unreasonably angry about this.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Steve Canon (steve@discuss.systems)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Nov-2023 01:19:12 JST Steve Canon -
Embed this notice
Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Nov-2023 01:19:11 JST Paul Cantrell @steve I’m missing it. What’s the irritant?
-
Embed this notice
Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Nov-2023 01:47:24 JST Paul Cantrell @steve
Ahhh, I was accepting it just because it is a statement amenable to being expressed using logical formalisms; in my mind, “logic” is this whole family of abstractions, not only the deductive process that uses them. -
Embed this notice
Steve Canon (steve@discuss.systems)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Nov-2023 01:47:25 JST Steve Canon @inthehands there's no logical deduction, this is axiomatic
-
Embed this notice
Steve Canon (steve@discuss.systems)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Nov-2023 01:47:25 JST Steve Canon @inthehands If the clue said "if a>b and b>c, then a>c in Peano arithmetic," I'd allow it =)
-
Embed this notice
Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Nov-2023 01:49:55 JST Paul Cantrell @steve What I’m unreasonably annoyed about is them passing up a perfectly good opportunity to print the word “Peano” in the NYT
-
Embed this notice
Steve Canon (steve@discuss.systems)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Nov-2023 01:49:56 JST Steve Canon @inthehands That's a perfectly reasonable normal-NYT-crossword-doer notion of "logic", hence "unreasonably".
-
Embed this notice
Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Nov-2023 01:50:33 JST Paul Cantrell @steve OK, see, now •that• is a reasonable cause for anger
-
Embed this notice
Steve Canon (steve@discuss.systems)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Nov-2023 01:50:35 JST Steve Canon @inthehands Me, I reflexively wrote in "AXIOM" while skimming clues, then saw "CX" and huffed and wrote "LEMMA", resulting in a time of 43 fucking seconds for a Monday mini.
-
Embed this notice