Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   undead enby of the apocalypse (enby_of_the_apocalypse@kolektiva.social)'s status on Monday, 13-Nov-2023 17:03:51 JST undead enby of the apocalypse

   in reply to

   • William Gillis 🏴

   @rechelon sink your ability to engage in resistance actions or your general quality of life, which most people wouldn’t want to be lowered, but I guess people don’t care about that either (or rather don’t want to think about it). I kinda don’t like the idea of reducing people’s well-being to their ability to do resistance actions like that, it feels too close to reproducing this (deeply ableist) capitalist logic of people’s ability to work being their defining feature, the thing that matters most, and what must be preserved above all else. And I still think seeing it as a bodily autonomy kind of thing is better. If someone wants to get longcovid then by all means go ahead (as long as they don’t infect others which is where the problem is with how so many people act right now), but most people don’t want that, and so to recklessly risk others (who might not want to have to put themselves or others at that risk) getting covid is a violation of their bodily autonomy. But I suppose those people don’t care about others bodily autonomy either.

   • Embed this notice
     William Gillis 🏴 (rechelon@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 13-Nov-2023 17:03:52 JST William Gillis 🏴

     Look, I know people don't care about the disabled, but being lax about operational security when it comes to a virus that can decimate your ranks and sink your ability to engage in resistance actions is bad security culture.