Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   K. Ryabitsev ???? (monsieuricon@social.kernel.org)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Oct-2023 01:22:16 JST K. Ryabitsev ????
   I don't think Linus would enjoy being transformed into an .exe
   • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Oct-2023 01:23:06 JST Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:

     in reply to
     @monsieuricon Reminds me of bootlin.exe or whatever the dos-based bootloader name was.
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Friday, 27-Oct-2023 10:18:58 JST 翠星石

     in reply to
     @monsieuricon He probably would if he was paid enough, just like how he's happy for the LF to accept payment from copyright infringing proprietary software companies in exchange for him getting paid for not enforcing his copyright.
     
     I'm noticing a pattern where every single piece of software licensed under a version of the GNU Public License family of licenses is called "open source", despite how such licenses clearly mention that they're free software ones and don't have "open" in them;
     https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FDOS/kernel/master/COPYING
     https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FDOS/freecom/master/license
     
     It's a shame that FreeDOS can only be compiled with a proprietary compiler as well.