Keep proprietary digital modes off ham radio!
https://ea5iyl.blogspot.com/2023/08/keep-proprietary-digital-modes-off-ham.html
Keep proprietary digital modes off ham radio!
https://ea5iyl.blogspot.com/2023/08/keep-proprietary-digital-modes-off-ham.html
@Ea5iyl I strongly agree with this. I am quite sad about the fact that vara has taken over email over hf scene since I have left. I understand the practicality but software freedom is what brought us many new exciting modes on radio. Soundcard modes were to save us from expensive and secretive hardware modems not to join them.
@Ea5iyl For me, #AmateurRadio is about experimentation and learning. #FreeOpenSourceSoftware and #FreeOpenHardware is key to this.
And no, it is not free as in free beer, but free as in free speech.
An alternative would be easy accessible documentation with easy to understand specifications. But I ofthen find it hard, if not impossible, to find any documentation. And if I do, I usually struggle to understand.
@hb9hox @Ea5iyl I'm advocate of open source also. But it is not simple. If you do it for your freetime then the burden of maintenance is a real chore. And you still need to have your day job. Alternative is to sell your product and work it full time to pay the bills.
Innovation (closed source or not) is the key. Moving forward is key. Competition is good. If someone steps up with FOSS competitor for VARA: Good! But if not then we continue using VARA because it gets the job done.
@oh8hub @hb9hox I understand your point of view. I spun off a company from the University: it sells services (not products) based on free/open-source software: an alternative business model (still going). Maintenance: free/open-source software can be in the hands of a community and often is. Open-source innovation has the potential for a larger uptake, community and business building. If you do not use closed-source software and licences, VARA is effectively an encrypted mode.
@clacke @Ea5iyl @hb9hox It's a idiom for accomplishing something.
https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/(someone%2fsomething)+gets+the+job+done
@oh8hub @clacke @hb9hox You did not mention the band for your 1000 km QSO, but I get the point. But my point was not about performance, but rather about transparency, openness and understanding, and how it relates to what one could call the ham spirit. There is no *understanding* here because the VARA developers (as ROS developers) have decided to hide their success behind a secret algorithm (which, by the way, has a bandwidth of 2 kHz [compare that to the few Hz taken by CW or PSK or FT8]).
@Ea5iyl @clacke @hb9hox VARA HF accomplishes a successful digital two way communication between two amateur radio stations.
I can send Winlink email from my portable station in Oulu to a station in Oslo using just 10W of power. That's 1000km QSO.
The speed is adjust automatically to conditions. With good propagation I can see nice transfer speeds, but with bad propagation or interference it still can function, but with lower speeds.
I've not yet found another tool with similar performance.
@oh8hub @clacke @hb9hox I know that idiom well. And my question was absolutely intentional, about the object or aim. What job? What do you accomplish?
@oh8hub "Nobody is forced to use it" is always used as an argument for convenience over openness and interoperability and it's only mostly true at best.
@Ea5iyl @clacke @hb9hox I'd love to see volunteers taking the challenge and start implementing open source version or competing alternative to VARA.
But while we're waiting, I'm happy to see the project continuously evolving and being used in real world.
We are not entitled to push down a project if at the same time we do not ourselves step up and provide alternative. There's too much hate and negativity in the world already.
Nobody is forced to use it. And many users area happy with it.
@clacke @oh8hub @hb9hox My stance is even more radical. I'm in favour of *prohibiting* the use of digital modes which are undocumented and closed-source and therefore effectively *encrypt* ham radio traffic for anyone who is not using the closed hardware or software. Ham radio communications should always be in the clear.
@Ea5iyl @clacke @hb9hox ITU Radio Regulations Edition of 2020 Vol I article 25.2A is probably what you're refering to:
"Transmissions between amateur stations of different countries shall not be encoded for the purpose of obscuring their meaning, except for control signals exchanged between earth command stations and space stations in the amateur-satellite service."
Here your argument seems to be that a modulation and/or encoding a message is equal to obscuring a meaning?
@oh8hub @clacke @hb9hox When the encoding is performed using an undocumented and undisclosed method, yes.
@oh8hub @Ea5iyl @clacke @hb9hox We are absolutely entitled to criticise people for doing what we perceive to be bad things. That's literally what free speech is.
Seriously, what even is that argument?
@Ea5iyl
I've argued this point for years, as you point out it isn't amateur radio.
This to me goes hand in hand with amateurs charging for software etc. Designs should as with s/w be open source. Otherwise your a business and shouldn't associate your callsign with it.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.