Is this true about Microsoft's Windows operating system?
https://tastingtraffic.net/@JustBlameWayne/111104661915277599
Is this true about Microsoft's Windows operating system?
https://tastingtraffic.net/@JustBlameWayne/111104661915277599
Yes, for the most part. They rectified most the issues with the Windows 7 kernel, but they still are fundamentally a vulnerable, single-user operating system with multiple users as an after thought, whereas Linux was multiuser from the beginning. Windows has become more stable over the years, but it keeps back stepping as they add new "features" where Linux tends to get its new features verified as stable long before mainstream use.
Linux is just a better OS.
Yes, exactly! Windows 3.x/9x was the desktop application for DOS. You are correct that NT was intended to be multiuser, but, as I said, it wasn't functionally multiuser until Windows 7, and even then it was a hack job that had to be fixed multiple times to get there. Now if they would have stayed with that stable multiuser philosophy for all the following major updates to their kernel, it might have remained competitive.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.