Yeah, I'll stay with bzip2. Unlike bzip3, both bzip2 and pbzip2 are under zlib loicence derivatives while bzip3 is LGPLv3
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
:segasaturn: (takao@shitposter.club)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 18:02:27 JST :segasaturn: mystia[0]> du -sh seamonkey-2.53.17.en-GB.linux-x86_64.tar.bz* 52M seamonkey-2.53.17.en-GB.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 52M seamonkey-2.53.17.en-GB.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2-pbzip 46M seamonkey-2.53.17.en-GB.linux-x86_64.tar.bz3 mystia[0]> time bzip2 -t seamonkey-2.53.17.en-GB.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 4.872u 0.010s 0:04.89 99.7% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w mystia[0]> time pbzip2 -t seamonkey-2.53.17.en-GB.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2-pbzip 4.800u 0.010s 0:04.81 100.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w mystia[0]> time bzip3 -t seamonkey-2.53.17.en-GB.linux-x86_64.tar.bz3 15.065u 0.052s 0:15.13 99.8% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w -
Embed this notice
翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 18:02:27 JST 翠星石 @takao A test on a single tar archive of a specific kind isn't really enough to come to a proper conclusion about a compression tool.
bzip3 is LGPLv3-or-later, which automatically makes it superior to software under pushover licenses, shame it isn't AGPLv3-or-later (but thankfully is can be upgraded to GPLv3-or-later).
-
Embed this notice