Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   laurel (laurel@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 07:11:36 JST laurel

   • Sexy Moon
   • Saber
   @Saber @Moon
   
   Notice that what he is really worried about is "productivity" and in his hubris productivity has fallen because the goys are not working as hard as they should be.
   
   It's not the troon commissars in every firm
   It's not women subsidized into the workplace
   It's not infinity niggers lowering the IQ
   It's not the negrification of culture
   It's not competency cratering
   It's not firms wasting billions pushing degenerate propaganda
   It's not those same firms being subsidized by the state
   It's not the censorship
   It's not the social degradation
   It's not the high crime
   It's not that people were forced in their homes for two years
   It's not the billions that are being sent to Ukraine
   It's not that every single facet of society is being judaized to the max
   It's not that the economy itself has turned into a gigantic grift
   
   No, it is these filthy goys not working themselves to the bone
   
   IT IS ALWAYS THE JEWS
   ea85830747ea757bf535bb55369c7394649449fadd0648f2d1d650a42e6487be.png
   • Embed this notice
     laurel (laurel@freespeechextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 07:11:35 JST laurel

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     • Saber
     • [hゥmァnォィd]:doge_a::verified:
     @irie @Moon @Saber
     
     I expected Malthus' work to be some kind of elaborate analysis on population control but when I read his book, however much I could tolerate reading that is, it was this kind of completely detached from reality theory, common in an upper class that has grown soft and incompetent. The only way they can grasp of keeping their wealth being to punch down those below them.
     
     Ayan Rand was completely nuts, a true zealot.
     
     I disagree about Adam Smith. I've read about 3/4 of his Wealth of Nations and I didn't see any problems with his point of view. If anything he was partially hostile to merchants and others not directly involved in productive work. I also really like his analysis on the true nature of money and profit. I'd highly recommend it to anyone wanting to learn about economics.
     
     Hobbes, Bentham and the other radical empiricists.
     This seems to be the exact ideology adopted by the earliest modern Globalists like Cecil Rhodes, eventually leading to groups like the Council on Foreign Relations.
     Sexy Moon likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     [hゥmァnォィd]:doge_a::verified: (irie@bae.st)'s status on Thursday, 14-Sep-2023 07:11:36 JST [hゥmァnォィd]:doge_a::verified:

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     • Saber
     @laurel @Saber @Moon the image is not loading for me for some reason. But what you say reminds me of a Larouche lecture I watched recently about Radical British Empiricism. How the purpose of the modern system is to keep the masses poor and uneducated, always struggling to cover bare necessities, with the purpose of materialistic amoral hedonism for a few.
     
     This is by the way the philosophical foundation of Adam Smith (father of capitalism), and what led to Ayn Rand (Rosenbaum :jew:) style psychopathy. This is often what Americans mean when they speak about liberty/capitalism. A jolly mix of megalomaniac misanthropic hedonism and judeo-atheist psychopathy. Malthus was also part of that club, btw, you know the guy who made the argument for depopulation.
     
     - only what we can sense does actually exist (every person senses differently, but never mind)
     - no morality outside of pain and pleasure
     - poor masses a necessity to assure pleasure for select few
     - keep knowledge limited and compartmentalized for masses
     2454564654.png
     2465466547.png
     45746874687.png
     sfgrdsre.png
     2454687465.png