Conversation

Notices

Embed this notice
Zenn black (zennblack@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 20:13:58 JST Zenn black

Hello? SCOTUS!
In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 20:13:58 JST from noagendasocial.com permalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment
  https://static.noagendasocial.com/media_attachments/files/111/034/886/242/936/987/original/aaecebcfe6ea225a.png
- Embed this notice
  Sir Funk ?? (sophistifunk@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 20:13:57 JST Sir Funk ??
  in reply to
  
  @Zennblack 😵
  
  In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 20:13:57 JST permalink
- Embed this notice
  ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 20:14:01 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??
  in reply to
  
  Only Congress can suspended habeas corpus, and even then, only when courts are unavailable to process arraignments.
  
  In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 20:14:01 JST permalink
- Embed this notice
  ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 21:35:35 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??
  in reply to
  - Senator_Armstrong
  Having the military helps, but unless you want to slip into full dictatorship, possibly lose the public sentiment, and destory the mythos of a republic, having congress authorize it pursuant to the constitution seems like the best political maneuver.
  
  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Merryman
  In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 21:35:35 JST permalink
  Attachments
  1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: upload.wikimedia.org
    
    Ex parte Merryman
    
    Ex parte Merryman, 17 F. Cas. 144 (C.C.D. Md. 1861) (No. 9487), was a controversial U.S. federal court case that arose out of the American Civil War. It was a test of the authority of the President to suspend "the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus" under the Constitution's Suspension Clause, when Congress was in recess and therefore unavailable to do so itself. More generally, the case raised questions about the ability of the executive branch to decline enforcement of judicial decisions when the executive believes them to be erroneous and harmful to its own legal powers. John Merryman was a prominent planter from Baltimore County, Maryland, who had been arrested at his rural plantation. Held prisoner in Fort McHenry in Baltimore harbor, he was kept inaccessible to the judiciary and to civilian legal authorities generally. U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney ruled in this case the authority to suspend habeas corpus lay exclusively with Congress. The Executive Branch, including the United States Army, under the authority of the President of the United States as Commander-in-Chief, did not comply with Taney's Merryman...
- Embed this notice
  Zenn black (zennblack@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 21:35:36 JST Zenn black
  in reply to
  - ?? Humpleupagus ??
  - Senator_Armstrong
  @Senator_Armstrong @Humpleupagus
  Every time they make these mistakes, the pushback is killer! I love this! Retards always out themselves.
  
  In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 21:35:36 JST permalink
  
  ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.
- Embed this notice
  Senator_Armstrong (senator_armstrong@seal.cafe)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 21:35:36 JST Senator_Armstrong
  in reply to
  - ?? Humpleupagus ??
  @Zennblack @Humpleupagus I don't like the constitution anyway, it's not like she hurt my feelings. But someone in her position, this didn't do her any favors.
  
  In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 21:35:36 JST permalink
  
  ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.
- Embed this notice
  Senator_Armstrong (senator_armstrong@seal.cafe)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 21:35:38 JST Senator_Armstrong
  in reply to
  - ?? Humpleupagus ??
  @Humpleupagus @Zennblack You can ignore a court whenever you want when you control the army - but she doesn't and she's a fool for saying this publicly.
  
  In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2023 21:35:38 JST permalink

Public

Conversation

Notices

Feeds