Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   PG_Kelly (pg_kelly@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 08:24:55 JST PG_Kelly

   Pope: U.S. conservatives replace faith with ideology https://spectrumnews1.com/ca/la-west/news/2023/08/28/pope-francis-conservatives-us-faith-ideology

   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 08:24:54 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • BlueDouche 🇺🇸 🇨🇦
     But the left has faith. You kinda have to when you believe that chopping a dick makes a person a woman.
   • Embed this notice
     BlueDouche 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 (bluedouche@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 08:24:55 JST BlueDouche 🇺🇸 🇨🇦

     in reply to

     @PG_Kelly
     The POPE is a MARXIST Jesuit.

     No One should take THIS Pope Seriously.

   • Embed this notice
     Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺 (ned@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 09:45:17 JST Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺

     in reply to

     @PG_Kelly he's just pissed they're protestant and not catholic.

   • Embed this notice
     RollrBones (higherground@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 10:48:10 JST RollrBones

     in reply to

     @PG_Kelly This article *seems* disinegenious. After reading it, I went on a search for other articles & came across this link. I realize it says "Vatican," so take it with a grain of salt.

     Have some serious doubts when spectrum news & a bunch of other corporate media outlets use the phrase "blasts conservatives" in unison.

     https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2023-08/pope-writing-second-part-of-laudato-si.html

   • Embed this notice
     Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺 (ned@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Tuesday, 29-Aug-2023 10:48:35 JST Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺

     in reply to

     • RollrBones

     @HigherGround @PG_Kelly "Obstructionist attitudes, even on the part of believers, can range from denial of the problem to indifference, nonchalant resignation or blind confidence in technical solutions." this is probably the most controversial part.

     I don't agree with the use of "obstructionist" as a problem. Because it's usually obstructing stupid ideas in the service of "human ecology" as mentioned previously. But in general I can agree, it's the interpretation and action where we disagree.