GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    feld (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Aug-2023 22:54:15 JST feld feld
    in reply to
    • Dan (phrawzty)
    • Miah Johnson
    • Pete Wright
    Bitwarden just announced their competitor:

    https://bitwarden.com/products/secrets-manager/

    The code for it is still open source, directly integrated into the existing password vault codebase
    In conversation Wednesday, 23-Aug-2023 22:54:15 JST from gnusocial.jp permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: bitwarden.com
      The Bitwarden Secrets Manager | Bitwarden
      End-to-end encrypted secrets management for development, DevOps, and IT teams.
    • Embed this notice
      Pete Wright (pete_wright@nlogic.systems)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Aug-2023 22:54:17 JST Pete Wright Pete Wright
      in reply to
      • Dan (phrawzty)
      • Miah Johnson
      @phrawzty @miah honestly - vault is a piece of software that could arguably have a price associated with it. It’s usually the most critical piece of software which contains your companies secrets, and it wouldn’t be hard to argue that paying for it would help ensure it survives and gets funded to stay secure.

      It makes no sense imho what they did with TF, it’s just a templating engine and API wrapper…keep that and packer open to keep good will and the community happy. Then explain you need to fund vault, consul and nomad. Those servers need full time paid engineers to keep them safe and reliable.
      In conversation Wednesday, 23-Aug-2023 22:54:17 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Miah Johnson (miah@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Aug-2023 22:54:19 JST Miah Johnson Miah Johnson
      in reply to
      • Dan (phrawzty)

      @phrawzty I agree, I don't think the opentf team should wait for Hasicorp to respond. They should fork and move on. But I'm not involved in the org so my thoughts don't really matter. I just want to use and work with actually open source software, and it's communities.

      Similarly, I have work to get done that would really benefit from a tool like Vault but I won't get involved with Hasicorp at this point. I don't have the skill set to maintain a Vault fork and nobody is talking about forking it.

      In conversation Wednesday, 23-Aug-2023 22:54:19 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Dan (phrawzty) (phrawzty@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Aug-2023 22:54:21 JST Dan (phrawzty) Dan (phrawzty)
      in reply to
      • Miah Johnson

      @miah I don't see any particular reason for HC to walk this back, tbqh. The fork will either be "successful" in which case it becomes an entirely different product over time, or it won't, in which case it fades away. Neither case requires HC to alter their course. 🤷

      In conversation Wednesday, 23-Aug-2023 22:54:21 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Miah Johnson (miah@hachyderm.io)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Aug-2023 22:54:22 JST Miah Johnson Miah Johnson

      Has the #opentf / #teraform folks heard back from Hasicorp yet? Where is #openvault? Are we over the BUSL BS?

      In conversation Wednesday, 23-Aug-2023 22:54:22 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.