> Neopronouns don't make them better or worse people.
It clearly outs them as an attention seeking narcissist; an energy vampire. They want every interaction with strangers to be as awkward as possible.
They know the other party will never get it right even if the person respectfully chooses "they". It gives them an opportunity to take control of a conversation because of something so stupidly trivial.
@kkarhan@feld@tomscott "They" seems best to me, for all the reasons Tom gives. If some people want to invent new pronouns, I've no objection, but they're very unlikely to catch on.
Or do you also consistently apply that to people from places like China and Taiwan if they don't choose some westernized name that is easy to write and speak as foreigner?
@kkarhan@tomscott@slowbikeiain to clarify: I am in 100% agreement with you on names. Names are names. The only difficulty is when they are very foreign and use phonetics that do not exist in the English language.
I don’t like that many people have to make up Westernized names to fit in, but I certainly understand why they do it: because they don’t want to deal with the conflict.
People who choose neopronouns want conflict. It is a passive aggressive power move.
Just because I can't read Chinese, Japanese or Thai doesn't mean someone's name is less genuine in those scripts than in phonetic script or any other scriptures like the western-latin we use here...
Same with last name systems like the icelandic -son / -dottir [son/daughter of] systems...
I disagree with that unless you actuall believe in that cringe nor/mal meme...
Seriously, I don't see any reason to think so, and if you're that thin-skinned to feel attacked by someone living outside a triary you use in lieu of a binary then maybe you don't have more important issues in you life...