Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Unironically yes
- Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: and :blobcathug: like this.
-
Embed this notice
@coolboymew Skyward Sword HD was interesting in the sense that it in one way was pretty low-effort, but since literally every single change was for the better and much-wanted, and since it even implemented a non-motion controls option, it actually ended up being better than many other remasters and remakes, including stuff like Majora's Mask 3D.
And lol@ Take-Two thinking they can get away with that shit just because Nintendo does, it's not their games people are buying the Switch for.
-
Embed this notice
@coolboymew I think the issue isn't so much the port being $50 it's the fact R* half-assed the RDR switch port and it got less features / content than the Xbox 360 / PS3 versions of the game that came out over a decade ago and you can get the Xbox 360 version of the game for $30 on a series console and it plays upscaled / better performance.
Honestly if you really want the definitive RDR experience you need to get a good PC and use Xenia since it's the only way you can play the game with 60FPS. All other ports / versions of the game run at 30FPS locked.
-
Embed this notice
@ooignignoktoo LESS features? Lel
-
Embed this notice
@coolboymew all they had to do was release on PC. wtf, man
-
Embed this notice
@coolboymew Yeah they completely nixed the online component. Knowing R* and Take-Two they only did it because they can't monetize the shit out of it like they could with RDR2 and GTA 5.
-
Embed this notice
Let's be honest: it's because people cared about nintendo games so much, they never even heard about the original.
-
Embed this notice
@coolboymew it's just Rockstar doesn't care about quality.
Should I remind you how bad GTA Trilogy was?