Andrew Tate is a scammer.
Is Andrew Tate a Con Artist?? Here's what Tucker and Candace missed!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=uLqCS0esFPE&feature=share
Andrew Tate is a scammer.
Is Andrew Tate a Con Artist?? Here's what Tucker and Candace missed!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=uLqCS0esFPE&feature=share
"he's a digital pimp"
..there's a job description..
its called onlyfans manager.
its not illegal.
he just did that before onlyfans was invented.
he doesn't do that anymore.
@mk @RyanG @DrFell but he was very proud of having done it up until at least last year.
"Andrew Tate is a scammer."
"Is Andrew Tate a Con Artist??"
definition: scammer:
"someone who makes money using illegal methods, especially by tricking people"
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/scammer
definition: con man
"a person who uses tricks to cheat people, esp. to get their money or possessions"
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/con-man
you could say he was a con man, because he tricked simps into emptying their wallets.
but this wasn't illegal. so he's not a scammer.
what is a con for you?
please provide your definition.
@mk @RyanG @DrFell he is a 'con man' who *was* running a 'con' and he is a fake.
since you refuse to answer, i'm telling you were i'm going with this..
if you use a loose definition of "con", you can argue that half of the alcohol, tobacco and beauty industry is running cons, because their advertisment doesn't reflect the products they ship.
does alcohol make you more attractive to women?
does cigarettes make you more free?
does anti-aging skin care stop your skin from aging?
"I guess you've never heard of romance scams but okay."
what? you mean when somebody uses their beauty/attraction to finess somebody out of ressources?
then you might just go ahead and write arrest warrents for half the females on this planet, my dude.
#myron #gaines
fresh and fit #podcast
00:40:50 "have you ever been on a #date with a guy who had zero #intention having #sex with. yes or no. yes. yes. yes[..]no[..]i have[..]no[..]yes"
@mk @ralphw @DrFell I guess you've never heard of romance scams but okay. He is not a person with morals. He was doing this not long ago and has done nothing to attempt to repent for that. I feel that he has conned, Candice Owens and Tucker Carlson. This dude is not a good role model for men. You have your opinion and I have mine. The guys a shit bag.
@RyanG @mk @DrFell >since you refuse to answer.
I went to sleep dude.
Con: an act or instance of duping or swindling.
Or a confidence scam.
Or "tricking simps into emptying their wallets."
Sure, I lot of other things are also "cons".
I would say false advertising is slightly different. Convincing individually targeted people vs broad spectrum advertising.
"He is not a person with morals[..]This dude is not a good role model for men[..]The guys a shit bag."
how many men did you stop from killing themselves?
"He was doing this not long ago and has done nothing to attempt to repent for that."
because there's nothing to apologize for.
"I feel that he has conned, Candice Owens and Tucker Carlson[..]You have your opinion and I have mine."
who cares about your feelings? fuck your feelings !
well..there's six-pack-guy
andrew tate
july 2023
01:09:32 "I had another guy said he was going to kill himself. I said listen[..]make me a promise get a six-pack first.[..]get in fantastic shape and then do whatever you want. didn't want to kill himself once he's in fantastic shape."
---
but he wouldn't count, because its andrews hearsay, huh?
@mk @RyanG @DrFell how many did he prevent killing themselves?
and justin doesn't count, because he's probably only cloud chasing?
Justin
00:06:36 "Andrew Tate you have you have really saved my life and brought me back to the old Justin that I knew that I was and capable of being Andrew I mentioned in an email to you about how I wanted to conquer and you"
how about you name one person who's life you saved and then i try to find more for andrew
@ralphw @mk @DrFell I guess having your emotions toyed with and losing thousands of dollars isn't enough to push some people over the edge. It's almost like this person has a crush on the Tate.
emotions toyed? money lost? crush on the tate?
@mk @RyanG @DrFell he is a hypocrite according to his own ideology.
when did he contradict himself?
"Andrew is a pioneer of that same cultural degeneracy"
can you please name one society that didn't have sex work of some kind?
@mk @RyanG @DrFell he said he chooses Islam as his religion because they stand up to cultural degeneracy, yet Andrew is a pioneer of that same cultural degeneracy and was unapologetic about it as of last year.
He openly brags about lying and defrauding men (which might not have been illegal due to international borders) and he currently sells subscription plans to men about self improvement.
@mk @RyanG @DrFell As far as saving people from suicide, first of all, by what moral standard is it even good to save people from their own choices? I have a standard for such, but what is yours?
"what moral standard is it even good to save people from their own choices?"
you're right. you should just go and delete yourself.
"which might not have been illegal due to international borders"
international borders? wtf are you talking about?
so. if it MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN ILLEGAL..he should apologize, because he hurt your feelings?
@mk @RyanG @DrFell first you argue the simps deserved to be defrauded, then you argue he is saving vulnerable people.
You have no standards for your arguments.
By your (lack of) logic, no one can criticize Tate unless they have done more good things than he has.
If a murderer does 100 good deeds, is he still guilty of murder?
"you argue the simps deserved to be defrauded, then you argue he is saving vulnerable people.
You have no standards for your arguments"
simp == sucker idolizing mediocre pussy
beeing suicidal doesn't make you a simp and beeing a simp doesn't make you suicidal.
1. i don't care about simps con'ned out of some money.
2. i do give credit to people for saving males lifes.
there's no contradiction.
you, on the other hand, are a fucking hypocrite.
"By your (lack of) logic, no one can criticize Tate unless they have done more good things than he has[..]If a murderer does 100 good deeds, is he still guilty of murder?"
you took the moral-highground and tried to argue that he deserves to be punished for beeing a immoral person and then you fell flat on your ass exposing yourself as a hypocrite without morals.
you're moral-arguments:
"He is not a person with morals[..]This dude is not a good role model for men[..]The guys a shit bag."
"chooses Islam[..]because they stand up to cultural degeneracy, yet Andrew is a pioneer of that same cultural degeneracy"
---
you're morals:
"saving people from suicide[..]by what moral standard is it even good to save people from their own choices?"
@mk @RyanG @DrFell as I said I'm my comment you quoted, I do have a moral standard for why that is wrong. We aren't arguing my moral standard for "saving" someone from suicide. You cant prove he saved anyone, and no one but you was even arguing the point. All you have done this entire time is logical fallacies and insults.
Goodnight.
"I do have a moral standard for why that is wrong. We aren't arguing my moral standard for "saving" someone from suicide."
you: "I do have a moral standard"
also you: "saving people from suicide[..]by what moral standard is it even good to save people from their own choices?"
you're a fucking joke.
---
"You cant prove he saved anyone"
here's justin testifying to be saved by andrew tate.
"You cant prove he saved anyone, and no one but you was even arguing the point."
you opened the door for character evidence here:
"He is not a person with morals[..]This dude is not a good role model for men[..]The guys a shit bag."
https://noagendasocial.com/@RyanG/110853853579999713
and i just provided counter evidence for that.
"All you have done this entire time is logical fallacies and insults"
i provided and asked for definitions
https://mastodon.satoshishop.de/@mk/110851883772560137
https://mastodon.satoshishop.de/@mk/110852087322525699
i tried to clarify positions
https://mastodon.satoshishop.de/@mk/110855683209788344
i countered you character -/ ad hominem arguments with actual evidence.
https://mastodon.satoshishop.de/@mk/110857676992040330
i debunked your "romance scams" position
https://mastodon.satoshishop.de/@mk/110854381458329068
i provided way more logic, reason than you.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.