Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   NatsumeShokogami (natsume_shokogami@mastodon.world)'s status on Saturday, 05-Aug-2023 18:48:49 JST NatsumeShokogami

   There are lots of instances proactively blocking bad instances (hate speech, racism, spam,...) which is good but sometimes they overdo it by blocking instances just because of some minor, redeemable mistakes from their admins or users; or because of incompatible views despite they haven't done anything wrong.

   Sometimes they even do the point that can be considered harassment towards that admin/mod/user as well.

   Mastodon convenent should be updated now.

   • :blobcathug: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     :blobcathug: (jain@blob.cat)'s status on Saturday, 05-Aug-2023 18:48:56 JST :blobcathug:

     in reply to
     @natsume_shokogami Yes i agree
   • Embed this notice
     :blobcathug: (jain@blob.cat)'s status on Saturday, 05-Aug-2023 18:53:58 JST :blobcathug:

     in reply to

     • :blobcathug:
     @natsume_shokogami The problem is how should a rule look like, which prevents this situation...
     Let me propose one:
     Instance Blocks need to be published and there should contain a proof