Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   George Takei :verified: 🏳️‍🌈🖖🏽 (georgetakei@universeodon.com)'s status on Saturday, 29-Jul-2023 10:31:43 JST George Takei :verified: 🏳️‍🌈🖖🏽

   And I say to Justice Alito, no provision in the Constitution gives him the authority to regulate women's bodies.

   • Embed this notice
     John Breen (jab01701mid@universeodon.com)'s status on Saturday, 29-Jul-2023 10:45:43 JST John Breen

     in reply to

     @georgetakei That's right, Mr Alito. the Congress cannot constrain the Executive or Judicial branch.
     And the Judicial branch can't constrain the Executive or Legislative branches. Or even individual states like Alabama.
     It's right there in the Constitution
     Not..

   • Embed this notice
     Judy Olo (judyolo@universeodon.com)'s status on Saturday, 29-Jul-2023 10:47:24 JST Judy Olo

     in reply to

     @georgetakei
     He sounds like Stephen Miller. Period! (the powers of the president to protect our country are very substantial and will not be questioned)

   • Embed this notice
     DoubleFelix (doublefelix@universeodon.com)'s status on Saturday, 29-Jul-2023 11:16:50 JST DoubleFelix

     in reply to

     @georgetakei Maybe Justice Alito should read the Constitution, Article III, section 2, which reads "In all cases affecting ambassadors, ... In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, AND UNDER SUCH REGULATIONS AS THE CONGRESS SHALL MAKE."
     How scary is it when one of the 9 SCOTUS Justices hasn't even read the Constitution?

   • Embed this notice
     G. Paul Randall (mushroot@universeodon.com)'s status on Saturday, 29-Jul-2023 18:21:48 JST G. Paul Randall

     in reply to

     @georgetakei #altText

     Screenshot of a social media post by Nate Raymond that reads:

     Justice Alito tells the Wall Street Journal that Congress has no business policing SCOTUS. "l know this is a controversial view, but I’'m willing to say it... No provision in the Constitution gives them the authority to regulate the Supreme Court —period."

   • Embed this notice
     Helena (thelastpinkcar@universeodon.com)'s status on Sunday, 30-Jul-2023 00:39:07 JST Helena

     in reply to

     @georgetakei Quite an inane comment from someone "interpreting" the constitution to regulate women and restrict our freedom.