mk
the only reason germany doesn't have blackouts every week is the willingness of other eu countries to step in and compensate our failing renewable energy system.
in the last 20 years we shut down 21 nuclear power plants, because the greens feel like their unsafe.
mk
i stand corrected. it was 17 nuclear power plants in 12 years.
Isar/Ohu 2 2023
Emsland 2023
Neckarwestheim 2 2023
Brokdorf 2021
Grohnde 2021
Gundremmingen C 2021
Philippsburg 2 2019
Gundremmingen B 2017
Grafenrheinfeld 2015
Unterweser 2011
Krümmel 2011
Biblis B 2011
Biblis A 2011
Philippsburg 1 2011
Isar/Ohu 1 2011
Neckarwestheim 1 2011
Brunsbüttel 2011
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Kernreaktoren_in_Deutschland#Kernkraftwerke
mk
and you also need much less concrete and steel.
locus
≠
We are still at eight billion, with ten or twelve billion the next target, and the falling birthrates have been offset by third world immigration.
So no, I think the disaster is very much the same.
locus
≠
Greens are useless unless they talk about population and urbanization.
mk
whats the disaster?
mk
you're a conspiracy story teller.
≠
Too many people = too much land = interrupted ecosystems and jet streams = ecocide + unstable local climates, but worldwide because we are doing the same stupid stuff worldwide.
mk
1. "Too many people = too much land"
2. "interrupted ecosystems and jet streams"
3. "ecocide + unstable local climates"
can you please provide evidence with proof of causation for your claims?
mk
you did gish gallop a couple of bullshit, right.
please articulate falsifiable positions and link your sources.
≠
I think I've written on this at length here and on the blog with citations where necessary.
≠
Are you a Redditor?
mk
are you a #npc ?
≠
It seems like you are having a tantrum here.
Asking for the reason why always gets an argument.
That argument is not new, nor has it been new here.
If you have counter-evidence you want to talk about, bring it aboard.
mk
"If you have counter-evidence"
you're making the claims. its your job to proof them. not mine with disproof them.
---
"burden of proof"
"You said that the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove."
mk
this has nothing to do with the topic. you're trying to distract. stop pivotting.
≠
I was told that this was a "conspiracy theory" a few months ago:
mk
so far you gish galloped a bunch of bullshit, tried to shift the burden of proof and tried to pivott away from your claims.
these are common tactics of leftist #npcs .
the only thing missing is ad hominem arguments.
i'm waiting for it.
≠
A question was asked and answered.
You are now trying to burden the poster with a dissertation's worth of material, ignoring what has been posted before.
mk
"A question was asked and answered."
you made unsubstantiated claims...you made up conspiracy stories.
≠
And if it is well-documented from the poster previously?
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Argument-from-Ignorance
Second case here.
mk
you didn't document anything. you just pulled shit out your ass.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.