learning clojure before scheme has given me such a bizarre set of politics about lisp. “first” > “car” come and get me
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
crows call me breadlady (garbados@friend.camp)'s status on Wednesday, 28-Jun-2023 01:35:23 JST crows call me breadlady -
Embed this notice
tech? no! man, see... (technomancy@icosahedron.website)'s status on Wednesday, 28-Jun-2023 01:35:23 JST tech? no! man, see... @garbados imo pervasive destructuring makes it almost a non-issue; it's relatively rare to need to call `first` or `rest` when you can bind against `[head & tail]`
-
Embed this notice
crows call me breadlady (garbados@friend.camp)'s status on Wednesday, 28-Jun-2023 01:39:23 JST crows call me breadlady @technomancy true facts. i found this type of destructuring in scheme to be really verbose, but like, the whole language is verbose, so…
band repeated this. -
Embed this notice
tech? no! man, see... (technomancy@icosahedron.website)'s status on Wednesday, 28-Jun-2023 01:39:23 JST tech? no! man, see... LISPERS: lisp is amazing; it lets you create any kind of abstraction you want!
ALSO LISPERS: let's name our fundamental functions after specific registers we used to use on the IBM 704
-
Embed this notice