the question, raised by Abad de Santillan and generally ignored by most of the contemporary radical left still is: how to prepare today, programmatically and practically, for a takeover of a modern capitalist economy where, in contrast to Spain in 1936, shutting down a large swath of socially useless and socially noxious activity will be a top priority from day one.
For many modern anarchists, “Spain” is a historical reference (more often symbolic than seriously studied and absorbed) in the way that “Russia” has been such a reference for many Marxists.
Despite all the factors (international, political, military) working for their demise, the Spanish working class and parts of the peasantry in the Republican zones arrived at the closest approximation of a self-managed society, sustained in different forms over two and a half years, ever achieved in history.
Just for perspective: "I was rather startled to find Leon Trotsky, major figure of the Russian Revolution and no friend of anarchism, saying, in 1937: “From the first day of the revolution, thanks to its specific weight in the economy of that country, and to its political and cultural level, (the Spanish proletariat) has been, not below, but above the level of the Russian proletariat at the beginning of 1917.”"
but whom I am talking to. A lot of people I am friends with see it as a problem too and from other people I do not have enough interaction to get into that talk anyway. so I mumble along.
@syndikalista I guess Cherán is one place I can hink of off the top of ma heid. They chased out the police, politicians and illegal logging cartels - all examples of useless and socially noxious activity
@syndikalista I think Graeber's work and other anti-work insurrectionists have provided a foundation for us to build off in this respect, but aye, it still is a question that needs evaluating