Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Saturday, 03-Jun-2023 01:19:27 JST Sexy Moon
   :imperialjapan:
   • on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ (lain@lain.com)'s status on Saturday, 03-Jun-2023 01:19:41 JST on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

     in reply to
     @Moon hard to believe but would be great
   • Embed this notice
     on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ (lain@lain.com)'s status on Saturday, 03-Jun-2023 01:23:40 JST on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

     in reply to

     • Wilmhit until cage breaks
     @wilmhit @Moon true
   • Embed this notice
     Wilmhit until cage breaks (wilmhit@froth.zone)'s status on Saturday, 03-Jun-2023 01:23:47 JST Wilmhit until cage breaks

     in reply to

     • on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
     @lain @Moon I wish that stealing trained models was also legal
   • Embed this notice
     Zettour (zettour@gearlandia.haus)'s status on Saturday, 03-Jun-2023 02:03:41 JST Zettour

     in reply to

     • on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
     • Wilmhit until cage breaks
     @wilmhit @lain @Moon Train your AI to produce a 1:1 duplicate of their model, problem solved.
     on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Saturday, 03-Jun-2023 15:05:31 JST 翠星石

     in reply to
     @Moon Yes, merely training a neural network with copyrighted material that you're authorized to have access to (i.e. intentionally publicly available on the internet) doesn't infringe copyright, as no copy is being distributed to anyone else.
     
     Nevertheless, copyright may apply to the resulting stored data (if you were to distribute that) and the output of such neutral network (if you were to distribute that output).