Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Leaked DMs from graf and Terry show that graf knew full well that Glitch, the convicted chomo of poast, knew full well of the crime he committed. Publicly graf's sys he didn't ban glitch because "doxing is against out rules" and decided to defederate users to spread notice of this publicly available information. In reality, graf says Glitch confessed that the accusations were legit, but that he said there was a small age difference. Glitch was charged when he was 25 so he was clearly full of shit. Graf says he "believed Glitch was being sincere" and never looked into this further despite the information being easily verifiable. #poastleaks
<2022-07-08T04:37:36.000Z> Terry: so bot is sperging about a sex offender on poast. I thought she was full of shit but those antifa assholes who doxxed you also did a piece on him last week
<2022-07-08T04:37:39.000Z> Terry: https://accollective.noblogs.org/post/2022/06/29/neo-nazi-sex-offender-and-poa-st-user-nathan-davies-aka-g117ch/
<2022-07-08T04:38:05.000Z> Terry attached a file
<2022-07-08T04:41:52.000Z> graf@poa.st: he explained to us in the matrix that it was a small age gap, i dont know what is or is not the case
<2022-07-08T04:42:25.000Z> graf@poa.st: I believe him that it was a case of being outside of a legal age gap because i have nothing to go on
<2022-07-08T04:42:34.000Z> graf@poa.st: I dont know what else im supposed to do with that information
<2022-07-08T04:42:43.000Z> graf@poa.st: im not a judge, im not a cop or lawyer or anything
<2022-07-08T04:43:46.000Z> graf@poa.st: am I going to ban someone because bot is crying about it? no.if it turns out something else is the truth and he mislead us then maybe
<2022-07-08T04:46:01.000Z> Terry: ok sorry I just thought you should know. I didn't know you were already aware of this
<2022-07-08T04:46:48.000Z> graf@poa.st: i mean shit in the US is public knowledge so if someone gives me evidence it wasnt a case of being like a 5 or 6 year age gap or something then i would but like i dont know what people expect me to do about it
<2022-07-08T04:47:54.000Z> graf@poa.st: im sorry im not bot and have unlimited time to stalk people, if you guys give me something to go on it would be appreciated
<2022-07-08T04:48:15.000Z> graf@poa.st: but judging from that article nothing about the case was included so it's half truth from one or the other, you know?
<2022-07-08T04:51:05.000Z> graf@poa.st: and on the other hand if we ban someone because he has a criminal record then what does that say about poast and it's users entitlement? you can have felonies and be a sex offender on twitter providing it doesnt violate your terms of release. so, i ask again, what do i do?
<2022-07-08T04:51:29.000Z> Terry: yeah you're right
-
Embed this notice
So true! It’s totally reasonable to trust registered child sex offenders and take them at their word!
-
Embed this notice
Btw did anyone ever determine the possible age gap?
-
Embed this notice
There’s too much lore for me to remember… :blobcatnotlikethis:
-
Embed this notice
bot you were there when we proved that by the specific paragraph of the specific statute he was charged under, the girl had to have been 13 or 14 and he was 24.
-
Embed this notice
Well yeah the short of it is that he was charged with the "child is 10 years younger than you but older than 13" statute and the sex offender registry lists both his birthday and when the incident occurred and from that we can tell he was 24 when it happened so the girl was 13-14 years old.
It took like 15 minutes to figure this out from the sex offender registry.
-
Embed this notice
@bot if glitch was charged at 25 then in most states the minimum age gap would be 8 years. (a 25yo in a relationship with a 17yo.) Imagine taking a chomo at their word and not verifying such things when it's so easily doable.
-
Embed this notice
@colonelj @bot
-
Embed this notice
@colonelj @bot
-
Embed this notice
Ooh yeah, I thought there was more. But yeah, and watch, ppl will STILL simp for graf. It’s crazy.