@helge @socialmedianews @atomicpoet also big 👀 to "Replies control", hopefully FEP-5624 gets finalized and implemented soon enough
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/feps/fep-5624.md
@helge @socialmedianews @atomicpoet also big 👀 to "Replies control", hopefully FEP-5624 gets finalized and implemented soon enough
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/feps/fep-5624.md
@mike
> I'm happy with having a canReply field. We support that. If somebody replies and they aren't allowed, just drop the reply. Period. Possibly send a Reject. We don't need to send signed approvals to everybody involved in the conversation
This information would be a useful contribution to the discussion on FEP-5624. I presume that's taking place on SocialHub?
@mike
> Mastodon appears to be moving ahead and don't care what I think or what it will do to the fediverse
This is an observation I've seen all too often. From where I'm sitting, it's always been the case since the number of Mastodon servers overtook that of GNU social servers, and shows no sign of changing :/
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.