GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    django (django@social.coop)'s status on Sunday, 21-May-2023 08:36:32 JST django django
    • Social Media News
    • Chris Trottier

    @helge @socialmedianews @atomicpoet also big 👀 to "Replies control", hopefully FEP-5624 gets finalized and implemented soon enough

    https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/feps/fep-5624.md

    In conversation Sunday, 21-May-2023 08:36:32 JST from social.coop permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: codeberg.org
      fep
      from fediverse
      Fediverse Enhancement Proposals
    • Embed this notice
      Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Sunday, 21-May-2023 08:36:14 JST Strypey Strypey
      in reply to
      • mike

      @mike
      > I'm happy with having a canReply field. We support that. If somebody replies and they aren't allowed, just drop the reply. Period. Possibly send a Reject. We don't need to send signed approvals to everybody involved in the conversation

      This information would be a useful contribution to the discussion on FEP-5624. I presume that's taking place on SocialHub?

      @helge

      In conversation Sunday, 21-May-2023 08:36:14 JST permalink
      Social Media News repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      mike (mike@macgirvin.com)'s status on Sunday, 21-May-2023 08:36:31 JST mike mike
      in reply to
      Hopefully without extinguishing the only projects with working comment controls in the process. We're not the enemy. I'm happy with having a canReply field. We support that. If somebody replies and they aren't allowed, just drop the reply. Period. Possibly send a Reject. We don't need to send signed approvals to everybody involved in the conversation. That is the most Rube Goldberg thing I've seen proposed yet. It doesn't scale. It will cause a civil war in the fediverse. If that's what you want, please unfollow me.
      In conversation Sunday, 21-May-2023 08:36:31 JST permalink
      Social Media News repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      mike (mike@macgirvin.com)'s status on Sunday, 21-May-2023 09:31:34 JST mike mike
      in reply to
      • Strypey
      • mike
      There was some lively discussion on the socialhub and I thought we were making progress, but now I'm not so sure. Talks have broken down. Mastodon appears to be moving ahead and don't care what I think or what it will do to the fediverse. We already have comment permissions and don't even need FEP-5624. If that document is played as is, we will no longer be able to federate with Mastodon - full stop. The fediverse will slow to a crawl and server costs will skyrocket because network traffic will triple - just to continue federating the exact same number of messages.

      Classic EEE.
      In conversation Sunday, 21-May-2023 09:31:34 JST permalink
      Social Media News repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Sunday, 21-May-2023 09:57:20 JST Strypey Strypey
      in reply to
      • mike

      @mike
      > Mastodon appears to be moving ahead and don't care what I think or what it will do to the fediverse

      This is an observation I've seen all too often. From where I'm sitting, it's always been the case since the number of Mastodon servers overtook that of GNU social servers, and shows no sign of changing :/

      In conversation Sunday, 21-May-2023 09:57:20 JST permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.