Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Butterfly_tsuji (butterfly_tsuji@spinster.xyz)'s status on Sunday, 14-May-2023 05:54:03 JST Butterfly_tsuji

   in reply to

   • Viceroyess

   @blingring I could be wrong but I thought Doxxing was posting someone’s address online…not saying their name ?

   google says: search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the internet, typically with malicious intent.

   Hmm it is unclear, but I’m sure their was no malicious intent. Also if a woman wants to square up with KJK in Real life why should she hide her name ? lol

   • Embed this notice
     F O T T F S O F A W Y G T F O S M...................... (xzy45@spinster.xyz)'s status on Sunday, 14-May-2023 05:54:03 JST F O T T F S O F A W Y G T F O S M......................

     in reply to

     • Viceroyess
     @Butterfly_tsuji @blingring Its 'identifying information', and a name is exactly that! From that people can find the rest on the internet. That particular person was knowing full well that they were hiding in plain sight of the one they were attacking, a risky game to play, and very uneven playing ground to be throwing rocks from right?
     
     I'm not sure I agree they should have their identity exposed, its crossed a line exposing their ID.
     Seahorses are horses likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Viceroyess (blingring@spinster.xyz)'s status on Sunday, 14-May-2023 05:54:04 JST Viceroyess
     Er, no. She - Jayne Egerton - was outed by Kathleen Stock over a week ago in a hilarious exchange on Twitter. After a tense exchange where Raquel Rosario-Sanchez hinted that she too knew who this sock account belonged to. Do keep up. As someone wise says: fuck around and find out. Enough is enough.
     https://twitter.com/cache_pas/status/1656005717273497601?cxt=HHwWgsDSwaGbqPstAAAA