Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Nomad Chris (gmodysseys@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 13:06:41 JST Nomad Chris

   If the metric known as “IQ” had real utility, wouldn’t we be able to ask and answer questions like

   “What minimum IQ is necessary for an individual to do _______?”

   • Embed this notice
     Bamm-Bamm (iamthebammbamm@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 13:06:40 JST Bamm-Bamm

     in reply to

     @GMOdysseys yes, people below an IQ of I think 86 can't be trained to do anything in the army.

   • Embed this notice
     Nomad Chris (gmodysseys@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 13:06:40 JST Nomad Chris

     in reply to

     • Bamm-Bamm

     @Iamthebammbamm

     “Can’t be trained” because the army wont train them?

     Also, I love that the cutoff number is 86 😂

   • Embed this notice
     Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺 (ned@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 13:06:40 JST Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺

     in reply to

     • Bamm-Bamm

     @GMOdysseys @Iamthebammbamm no, because they literally can't be trained. In the same way you can't teach a 2yo to play chess.

   • Embed this notice
     Bamm-Bamm (iamthebammbamm@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 13:06:41 JST Bamm-Bamm

     in reply to

     @GMOdysseys lol, the army has studied this extensively and has a lower IQ cutoff for people who can't do shit

   • Embed this notice
     Nomad Chris (gmodysseys@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 13:06:41 JST Nomad Chris

     in reply to

     • Bamm-Bamm

     @Iamthebammbamm and has that policy produced measurable outcomes?

   • Embed this notice
     Nomad Chris (gmodysseys@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 13:27:52 JST Nomad Chris

     in reply to

     • Bamm-Bamm
     • Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺

     @ned

     Even if the 2yo has an IQ of 87?

     @Iamthebammbamm

   • Embed this notice
     Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺 (ned@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 13:45:10 JST Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺

     in reply to

     • Bamm-Bamm

     @GMOdysseys @Iamthebammbamm IQ is age adjusted. So yeah. Kid could have an IQ of 150, they still won't be able to remember anything you tell them.

   • Embed this notice
     Nomad Chris (gmodysseys@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 14:31:21 JST Nomad Chris

     in reply to

     • Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺
     • Aristeia

     @DF15 @ned

     I heard that an IQ of 145+ is required to be able to be able to ask the question of whether or not IQ is an overly-simplistic metric and whether or not it actually supports a model that can make predictions about individuals or populations.

   • Embed this notice
     Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺 (ned@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 14:31:21 JST Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺

     in reply to

     • Aristeia

     @GMOdysseys @DF15 LOL, sure.

   • Embed this notice
     Aristeia (df15@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 14:31:23 JST Aristeia

     in reply to

     @GMOdysseys Conversations in themselves can perform as IQ tests. It's been studied many times that higher IQ individuals can have a harder time communicating with lower IQ individuals and it is recommended to refrain from in depth conversation with individuals who could be more than 15+ IQ points off of yourself.

     As someone who scored over a 130 on IQ tests 3 times whether that means anything or not, conversing with some people can be impossible as with logic outside of binary thought

   • Embed this notice
     Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺 (ned@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2023 14:33:58 JST Sir Nedwood - Sydney 🇦🇺

     in reply to

     • Aristeia

     @DF15 @GMOdysseys >logic outside of binary thought.

     Formal logic is mostly binary thought.