Good luck to the Bluesky / AT folks, truly. The main thing that frustrates me is this claim that AP can't do this though. (The Bluesky folks are aware of this, we both wrote some documents about it together, so they *should* know, that's my main irritation with the FAQ item that says ActivityPub can't do it.)
But also:
- I am not currently focused on ActivityPub so maybe it's not the best question to direct at me anymore - I am focused on Spritely, which will eventually loop back to AP stuff, but that's not its current focus (it's a bit more general and dare I say a bit more revolutionary to how applications are written than that) - I have never been interested in making a Twitter replacement because I am not convinced a global content space is necessarily a good idea - It's good that almost everyone agrees that decentralized networks are fundamentally necessary now though - I am glad that AT/Bluesky is using DIDs and some other components that really might be truly useful - I am not the best person to ask this question, but I guess I am one of the most obvious people to ask this question
@bnewbold@ehashman@lathamgreen That makes sense! And I haven't been against the AT work, I've been bothered by the Bluesky (mis)communication about AP's ease of ability to be used for these purposes. I spent a bunch of time making sure during the spec authoring process that AP could be.
I agree that there's a different lineage though, and that the brightest future may be ahead and something convergent, and we don't know what it is yet.
part of this is that many of us on the team see ourselves as coming from a different lineage, that of scuttlebutt and dat://. merkel-dag-verse, not W3C-verse. which is a much smaller community, granted, but a pretty thoughtful and values-driven. it feels like we are stemming from that work closer towards activitypub; and that we will all inevitably be sythensized together by a future successor
@ehashman@lathamgreen@bnewbold No doubt. The FAQ item claiming AP *couldn't* do it stung though because I spent a large amount of time detailing with Jay about how to do this, we even co-authored a document about it (maybe she didn't write that FAQ item or notice it though, I haven't talked with her about it, and maybe I should instead of just being frustrated about it here...).
I think that if they were going to build something that looked so much like decentralized AP, they could have started with the decentralized AP we spent time talking about... or at least not claim that it wasn't possible.
But I think there are some positive things coming out of the work, whether or not it succeeds. And again, I like and admire Jay Graber a lot, and I'm glad there are other good people involved. I'm serious when I say I wish the project luck in its particular domain of work, maybe something interesting will come out of it.
@cwebber@lathamgreen there are other cool people on the team building it too. I had no idea @bnewbold had left the IA to work on bluesky until I made an account!