I know this is impulse but I fundamentally don’t agree with trigger warnings as a concept. I’ll try to honor them/respect people who need them if I know in advance, but I fundamentally don’t believe in them. I’m glad Cornell pushed back.
This shit started when I was in college and I don’t think it has had a positive effect on anyone. If anything, the ability to guard ourselves from anything potentially upsetting has made us more polarized and less able to connect with one another or to truly understand and empathize with trauma.
@colin@film_girl@misc it does seem silly but I have had enough friends with what are unfortunately literally life-threatening food-related disorders that I CW all food anyway
@misc@vaurora Like I said, I'll always try to be thoughtful and courteous if I know in advance. But I'm not going to go out of my way to use them and I'm not going to preface any mention of a film/book with a CW, I'm just not.
@film_girl@vaurora I always just assume that the fact that I don't need them means I'm not who they're for. I don't want to second guess people who have a harder time. It does get a little overboard here - but I think mostly because its use blends into post titles / category metadata. In general CWs just seem like a nice courtesy, not something to be uptight about, in any direction. (Unless it's, like, flashing lights.)