Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Ademan (ademan@thebag.social)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:04 JST Ademan

   in reply to

   • Sexy Moon
   • Sebastian Rieger
   • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

   128 bits is an awful lot, you’re not really saving any bytes vs string names at that point

   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:04 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸
     @ademan @rieger_san @benjaminbellamy yeah. my first version was actually just a 16 bit integer id, if we exceed 65k activity types lets just change the protocol then and not worry about it now
     on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Ademan (ademan@thebag.social)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:05 JST Ademan

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

     At least with names you probably need to be engaging with similar problems to run into a name collision

   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:05 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸
     @ademan @rieger_san @benjaminbellamy yeah true. i was experimenting last year a bit and also settled on numbers but what i did was hash a name+versionid to 128 bits if i revisit it i will revise it to also hash your author id into it so there's not likely to ever be a collision. 128 bits is a lot though
   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:06 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸
     @ademan @rieger_san @benjaminbellamy yeah it rubs me the wrong way even though theres nothing stopping two implementors on fedi from giving their new activity the same name and confusing servers
   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:07 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸
     @ademan @rieger_san @benjaminbellamy i got a little hung up over evend kind ids being seemingly centrally defined unless you literally can just pick a number and start coding a new event
   • Embed this notice
     Ademan (ademan@thebag.social)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:07 JST Ademan

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

     Since it’s opaque to relays you can do whatever, but I don’t like kind ids being numeric because collisions are going to be common between people experimenting. You need to coordinate it somehow.

     (Also encoding persistence behavior into numeric ranges is super dumb)

   • Embed this notice
     Ademan (ademan@thebag.social)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:08 JST Ademan

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

     or if they want to implement it out of spec…

   • Embed this notice
     Sebastian Rieger (rieger_san@mastodontech.de)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:16 JST Sebastian Rieger

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

     @Moon @benjaminbellamy @ademan that’s true! Everyone can create a NIP and the community then discuss the pros and cons.

     There is no roadmap or something like this.

     When a NIP is finalized everyone can decide if he want to implement it or noy

   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:17 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸
     @rieger_san @ademan @benjaminbellamy but a random guy on nostr insisted to me that nostr development is not centrally controlled
   • Embed this notice
     Sebastian Rieger (rieger_san@mastodontech.de)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:18 JST Sebastian Rieger

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

     @ademan @benjaminbellamy @Moon
     Nostr is an open protocol that only exists because of the nips.
     There is reference implementation, which means the specs are the only source of truth

   • Embed this notice
     Ademan (ademan@thebag.social)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:19 JST Ademan

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

     specs aren’t always followed in practice, especially when things are rapidly changing, and that seemed to be what was happening from what @Moon said, but it turned out not to be the case.

   • Embed this notice
     Sebastian Rieger (rieger_san@mastodontech.de)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:20 JST Sebastian Rieger

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

     @ademan @benjaminbellamy @Moon nips are the protocol spec’s! They are up to date ?

   • Embed this notice
     Ademan (ademan@thebag.social)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:21 JST Ademan

     in reply to

     • Sexy Moon
     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

     I wonder how horribly out of date the NIPs are then https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/57.md Granted I just skimmed it but it looked like lnurl was integral to the process

   • Embed this notice
     Ademan (ademan@thebag.social)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:22 JST Ademan

     in reply to

     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

     zaps require lnurl? gross

   • Embed this notice
     Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:22 JST Sexy Moon

     in reply to

     • Sebastian Rieger
     • :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸
     @ademan @rieger_san @benjaminbellamy i've received sats using plain old ln address
   • Embed this notice
     :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸 (benjaminbellamy@podcastindex.social)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:28 JST :pci: Benjamin Bellamy 🇺🇸

     in reply to

     • Sebastian Rieger

     @rieger_san
     https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/57.md

   • Embed this notice
     Sebastian Rieger (rieger_san@mastodontech.de)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:29 JST Sebastian Rieger

     in reply to

     • Castopod :podcasting2:

     @Castopod everyone who voted with no has not heard of zap’s! They are a game changer for content creators!

   • Embed this notice
     Castopod :podcasting2: (castopod@podlibre.social)'s status on Wednesday, 01-Mar-2023 16:36:30 JST Castopod :podcasting2:

     Hmmm… Maybe too soon… ??
     #nostr