So, I've had some responses with violent ideation in them.
Even if you're "just joking" or "only saying", it is not welcome in my head or on my timeline.
I had to block some nice people I don't know well, which was regrettable.
So, I've had some responses with violent ideation in them.
Even if you're "just joking" or "only saying", it is not welcome in my head or on my timeline.
I had to block some nice people I don't know well, which was regrettable.
@evan haven't seen the replies, didn't occur as a response to your question, but ... How do you feel about e.g. Ministry for the Future? I haven't read it but my understanding is that it revolves around the idea that inaction on climate change *is* violence (not just ideation) by politicians and capitalists against esp. the global south / BIPOC and that at some point agonism unavoidably turns to antagonism?
@blaine I very much liked the Ministry for the Future!
I can't have my personal feed and site, with my real name and real associations, be a place for graphic speculation on terrorist violence.
It would interfere with my work and my colleagues' work, both on the fediverse and for climate change tech.
@Irreverent_B Understood. Honestly, I just don't want obviously problematic keywords showing up in my public feed.
When I said revolutionary, I certainly did not mean or mean to imply violence.
I'm guessing you realised that as I'm not blocked, yet want to be clear:
Yes, I think we need revolutionary changes. No I do not see violence as acceptable or useful.
Only peace can overcome violence.
@evan please tell me what "ideation" means. Wikipedia is not helpful ?
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.